Search for: "Companies A, B, and C" Results 8481 - 8500 of 12,883
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Apr 2012, 7:21 pm
Section 145 in that Chapter provides for definitions:(a) authorised insurer, (b) certificate of insurance, (c) liability, (d) policy of insurance, (e) property, (f) reciprocating country and (g) third party.9. [read post]
19 Apr 2012, 10:39 am
This Directive should not regulate transactions with consumers, interest in connection with other payments, for instance payments under the laws on cheques and bills of exchange, or payments made as compensation for damages including payments from insurance companies. [read post]
19 Apr 2012, 10:39 am
This Directive should not regulate transactions with consumers, interest in connection with other payments, for instance payments under the laws on cheques and bills of exchange, or payments made as compensation for damages including payments from insurance companies. [read post]
19 Apr 2012, 6:12 am by Jim Singer
In other words, if a company was a plaintiff in any patent infringement suit during the past ten years, or if the company ever threatened or instituted litigation against Twitter or any of its more than 140 million users, customers or suppliers, then that company is fair game to be sued under Twitter’s patents. [read post]
18 Apr 2012, 7:20 pm by David Smyth
 Moreover, “[s]ecurities issued by smaller companies of recent origin obviously require more thorough investigation. [read post]
18 Apr 2012, 5:01 pm by Oliver
Le blog du droit européen des brevets has reported on two recent (still to be published) decisions on a test case built by two Dutch companies working together in the study committee for intellectual property of VNO-NCW, the Confederation of Netherlands Industry and Employers. [read post]
18 Apr 2012, 7:02 am by William Carleton
A company may pursue technologies A, B, and C, and 10 years later that company is mainly focused on C. [read post]
18 Apr 2012, 6:01 am by Ben Vernia
Another whistleblower had raised the allegations first, and the U.S. moved to dismiss on both first-to-file grounds (under 31 USC 3730(b)(5)) and then under its authority to move to dismiss qui tam cases (under 31 USC 3730(c)(2)(A)). [read post]
18 Apr 2012, 4:59 am by Rob Robinson
  bit.ly/HzXpGZ (Joshua Engel) Communications with Unretained Experts, Unprotected by Rule 26(b)(B)(4)(C) – Any Exceptions? [read post]
17 Apr 2012, 8:28 pm by Aaron Barkoff
"  Here, although subsections (b) and (c) refer expressly only to "the patent number and the expiration date of any patent" claiming the drug or a method of its use, the Court read "submitted under" broadly. [read post]
17 Apr 2012, 5:55 pm by FDABlog HPM
” A patent use code qualifies as “patent information” that is submitted under FDC Act 505(b) and (c). [read post]
17 Apr 2012, 11:03 am by lkravets
The Innovator’s Patent Agreement may at first set Twitter apart from other Silicon Valley technology companies like Google and Facebook, with which Twitter competes for developers if these companies do not provide a similar agreement. [read post]