Search for: "Does 1 - 23" Results 8481 - 8500 of 15,450
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Jan 2023, 9:06 am by INFORRM
On 9 January 2023, the Court issued press release 1/23 announcing that as from 1 January the names of national persons in new preliminary references would no longer be composed of initials, but of fictional names which will not in principle be existing names. [read post]
4 Feb 2019, 4:33 am by Oswin Ridderbusch
The final report of the Committee on Legal Affairs was adopted on 23 January 2019 (PDF), and was tabled on 29 January 2019 for a future plenary first reading in the European Parliament. [read post]
7 Aug 2018, 5:31 am by Eugene Volokh
The movie, in its entirety, without the credits was 1 hour, 58 minutes, and 14 seconds.... [read post]
30 Jan 2019, 9:03 am by Kevin Kaufman
— 46 0.00% 0.00% 47 0.00% Pa. 6.00% 16 0.34% 6.34% 34 2.00% R.I. 7.00% 2 0.00% 7.00% 23 0.00% S.C. 6.00% 16 1.43% 7.43% 17 3.00% S.D. [read post]
22 Feb 2012, 4:40 am by Rob Robinson
Judge Rules Spousal Privilege Does Not Apply to Text Messages - bit.ly/y8dfOU (Zack Needles) Predictive Coding Tipping Point? [read post]
5 Mar 2012, 7:24 am by Rebecca Tushnet
”  Again, Rule 23 doesn’t incorporate Rule 12(b)(6). [read post]
6 Aug 2012, 2:28 pm by Matthew David Brozik
”) •             •             • Although, as mentioned above, the appellate court opinion is 23 pages long, it can be distilled to the following questions and answers: (1) Is the plaintiffs’ claim of breach of an implied contract preempted by the federal Copyright Act? [read post]
4 Jan 2016, 12:05 pm by Kenneth Vercammen Esq. Edison
If, through error, general letters of appointment are afterwards issued to another, the first appointed personal representative may recover any property of the estate in the hands of the personal representative subsequently appointed, but the acts of the latter done in good faith before notice of the first letters are not void for want of validity of appointment.3B:10-23. [read post]
16 Aug 2017, 10:43 am by Kenneth Vercammen Esq. Edison
If, through error, general letters of appointment are afterwards issued to another, the first appointed personal representative may recover any property of the estate in the hands of the personal representative subsequently appointed, but the acts of the latter done in good faith before notice of the first letters are not void for want of validity of appointment.3B:10-23. [read post]
17 Aug 2017, 8:27 am by Kenneth Vercammen Esq. Edison
If, through error, general letters of appointment are afterwards issued to another, the first appointed personal representative may recover any property of the estate in the hands of the personal representative subsequently appointed, but the acts of the latter done in good faith before notice of the first letters are not void for want of validity of appointment.3B:10-23. [read post]
12 Jun 2019, 4:42 pm by INFORRM
It found that the repetition rule is irrelevant to the threshold of seriousness and that “nothing in the 2013 Act can be taken as implicitly abolishing it or limiting its application” [23]. [read post]
24 Apr 2020, 6:14 am by Dan Cooper and Luca Tosoni
Other legal bases may be relevant; in particular Article 6(1)(e) (e.g., processing for the performance of a task in the public interest) may apply. [read post]
30 Jun 2012, 2:46 pm by joel
Co., 520 U.S. 17, 21 (1997). [10]  See Alan Devlin, The Misunderstood Function of Disclosure in Patent Law,23 Harv. [read post]
3 May 2009, 12:17 pm by Peter J. Cavanaugh
If the contract does not otherwise provide for it, the Engineer may wish to incorporate the terms from the AIA A201 section 13.2.1, which provides the Architect will remain bound even if an assignment is made (see above). 3) EJCDC 1910-1 (1996) and E-500 (2002) Standard Form of Agreement Between Owner and Engineer for Professional Services The non-assignment language remained the same from the EJCDC 1910-1, 1996 edition to the EJCDC E-500 2002 edition: … [read post]
7 Mar 2022, 1:15 pm by Kevin LaCroix
  The Court’s March 1, 2022 Order In his March 1, 2022 order, Northern District of California Judge Jon S. [read post]