Search for: "English v. English"
Results 8481 - 8500
of 11,204
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 May 2011, 10:54 am
In Easterling v. [read post]
11 May 2011, 8:50 am
See also Graham v. [read post]
10 May 2011, 10:02 pm
These will be made available to international patent offices through the Traditional Knowledge Digital Library (TKDL), TKDL director V K Gupta told reporters here. [read post]
10 May 2011, 8:13 pm
Pastore, 469 U.S. 238, 240 (1985); see also Arizonans for Official English v. [read post]
10 May 2011, 1:00 pm
Italy International Extradition Treaty with the United States October 13, 1983, Date-Signed September 24, 1984, Date-In-Force 98TH CONGRESS 2d Session SENATE LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL THE WHITE HOUSE, April 18, 1984. [read post]
10 May 2011, 10:58 am
Or sex vs sensible journalism, tabloids vs broadsheets, the UK v the ECHR. or even the English High Court and Justice Eadie vs the Rest of the World. [read post]
10 May 2011, 9:00 am
ARTICLE V Extradition shall be granted only if the evidence be found sufficient, according to the laws of the place where the person sought shall be found, either to justify his committal for trial if the offense of which he is accused had been committed in that place or to prove that he is the identical person convicted by the courts of the requesting Party. [read post]
10 May 2011, 8:52 am
The debate will run and run… it is not over yet. *** Carl Gardner, author the Head of Legal blog: Mosley v UK [read post]
10 May 2011, 3:55 am
The Fourth Section of the Court of Human Rights today gave judgment in the case of Mosley v United Kingdom (Judgment of 10 May 2011). [read post]
10 May 2011, 3:55 am
Ayazi, a former teacher of English as a Second Language employed by the New York City School District’s Grover Cleveland High School, filed charges with PERB alleging that her union, the United Federation of Teachers [UFT]: 1. [read post]
9 May 2011, 7:57 pm
However, in Forosal v ONGC AIR 1984 SC 241, the Supreme Court held that since our contract law is based on English Law, it would do good to rely on English decisions for aiding the courts decide such issues where there was no Indian decision on the point. [read post]
9 May 2011, 6:00 pm
Reid v. [read post]
9 May 2011, 1:00 pm
ARTICLE V (1) Extradition shall not be granted if: (a) the person sought would, if proceeded against in the territory of the requested Party for the offense for which his extradition is requested, be entitled to be discharged on the grounds of a previous acquittal or conviction in the territory of the requesting or requested Party or of a third State; or (b) the prosecution for the offense for which extradition is requested has become barred by lapse of time according to the law of the… [read post]
9 May 2011, 9:00 am
Ireland International Extradition Treaty with the United States July 13, 1983, Date-Signed December 15, 1984, Date-In-Force MESSAGE FROM THE PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES 98TH CONGRESS 2d Session SENATE LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL THE WHITE HOUSE, April 18, 1984. [read post]
9 May 2011, 7:39 am
More on Atkins v. [read post]
9 May 2011, 4:00 am
In King v. [read post]
9 May 2011, 3:54 am
See Adam Wagner’s post McCarthy v United Kingdom (Case C? [read post]
8 May 2011, 5:18 pm
The Supreme Court of Israel sitting as the High Court of Justice has made available in English translation its important 2009 decision in Abu Rahme v. [read post]
6 May 2011, 7:08 pm
In M.B.Z. v. [read post]
6 May 2011, 1:00 pm
ARTICLE V A fugitive criminal shall not be surrendered under the provisions of this Treaty, when from lapse of time or other lawful cause, according to the laws of the place within the jurisdiction of which the crime was committed, the criminal is exempt from prosecution or punishment for the crime for which the surrender is asked. [read post]
