Search for: "Little v. Little" Results 8481 - 8500 of 39,479
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Mar 2019, 1:54 am by Ben
" The appeals court said that as it stood, Cox wasn't entitled to rely on safe harbor because it did very little if anything even when told about repeat offenders - an important precedent. [read post]
21 Mar 2019, 1:44 pm
Furthermore, the judge found that Plum & Posey's designs were not a "colourable imitation" of the Plaintiff's, as the similarities were more plausibly the result of using similar image sources and then choosing to modify the jewellery a little differently.Phelan J. further underlined how the original features of Pyrrha's designs relate to the skill and judgement performed in the process of oxidization by Pyrrha. [read post]
21 Mar 2019, 7:43 am by Brandon Harter
That all changed in the January 2019 decision by the Pennsylvania Superior Court in Pittsburgh Logistics Systems v. [read post]
21 Mar 2019, 6:37 am by Eric Goldman
Given the plaintiff lawyers’ past responses to courtroom losses, there’s little chance this ruling is the end of the case. [read post]
20 Mar 2019, 9:01 pm by Samuel Estreicher
Kleber also cannot be easily reconciled with aspects of the Supreme Court’s landmark ruling in Griggs v. [read post]
20 Mar 2019, 5:17 pm by INFORRM
Platforms would be duty-bound to act quickly, and must have as little doubt as to which content, as a matter of law, qualifies as objectionable. [read post]
20 Mar 2019, 9:24 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
In fact, they differ very little from theclaims in Electric Power Group, LLC v. [read post]