Search for: "State v. N. N." Results 8481 - 8500 of 21,441
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Dec 2014, 7:53 am
This decision opens a door to liability on the part of the owner of the later registered Spanish trade mark which was until now restricted.David and Juan Carlos are of course happy to discuss the ramifications of this decision further with anyone who'd like to contact them.The IPKat adds: readers who are familiar with Community trade mark law may recall the decision of the Court of Justice of the European Union in Case C‑561/11 Fédération Cynologique Internationale… [read post]
15 Aug 2012, 7:52 am by PaulKostro
Transit Corp., 161 N.J. 107, 120 n.2 (1999) (quoting Rendine v. [read post]
20 Jul 2022, 8:27 am by Holman
By Chris Holman A couple days ago Dennis posted a nice review of the Federal Circuit’s recent decision in CareDx v. [read post]
23 Apr 2009, 10:14 am
This is the second TV film by Adelita Coriat and combines the original shown last September (over 1000 viewings) it divulges more facts about the scams on Isla Solarte in the Bocas del Toro archipelago selling RoP (Derechos Possesorios) of state owned land in Panama. [read post]
2 Jul 2015, 3:04 pm
[I]n interpreting Section 16.02, we may rely on decisions from other state courts and federal courts construing the Wiretap Act. [read post]
14 Jun 2016, 12:02 am
Menaker, The Consequences of Corruption in Investor-State Arbitration Alain Pellet, Police Powers or the State’s Right to Regulate Mark Feldman, Denial of Benefits after Plama v. [read post]
15 Aug 2017, 7:30 am by Philip Zelikow
  The judge, Gabrielle McDonald, granted our request and in 1982 shut down the training activities in Vietnamese Fishermen’s Ass’n v. [read post]
13 Feb 2017, 4:00 am by Howard Friedman
Is There a Thumb on the Scale in Refugee Convention Appellate Court Adjudication in the United States? [read post]
2 Dec 2014, 4:00 am by The Public Employment Law Press
Thus, said the court, ECSO was not required under the Americans with Disabilities Act (42 USC §12101 et seq.) or the New York State Human Rights Law (Executive Law §296) to accommodate her disability by creating such a light duty position for her.* See also County of Erie v New York State Div. of Human Rights, 2014 NY Slip Op 07829, Appellate Division, Fourth Department** Executive Law §296(3)(b) requires employers to make reasonable accommodations to permit… [read post]