Search for: "Brown v. Brown"
Results 8501 - 8520
of 12,671
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Dec 2011, 2:00 am
Id. at 603; see also Brown v. [read post]
12 Feb 2024, 7:39 pm
The specter of Dunning School history haunted oral argument in Anderson v. [read post]
20 Apr 2023, 6:41 am
Garland and Garland v. [read post]
23 Mar 2011, 3:43 am
Lords Phillips and Brown (with whom Lord Rodger agrees) dissent and hold that because the appellants would have been lawfully detained the Secretary of State is not liable to them in false imprisonment: [319]-[334], [343]-[360]. [read post]
24 Apr 2015, 8:55 am
BRAZOS COUNTY APPRAISAL DISTRICT AND APPRAISAL REVIEW BOARD FOR BRAZOS COUNTY APPRAISAL DISTRICT, No. 13-0593 Opinion of the Court Previously: One new opinion, one revised opinion, and six grants (October 5, 2014) BROWN & GAY ENGINEERING, INC. v. [read post]
24 Jun 2007, 3:15 pm
Brown, 333 U.S. 18 (1947). [read post]
2 Mar 2012, 9:45 am
Brown (1997), and Monell v. [read post]
25 Aug 2008, 1:11 am
Clemmer v. [read post]
23 Jun 2010, 2:50 am
(The Knowsley argument, paralleling the finding on assured tenants on Knowsley Housing Trust v White, link to our report) ii) Brent v Knightley was wrongly decided, such that the right to apply under s.85 Housing Act 1985 survived the (ex) tenant's death iii) Such a right to apply is a possession under article 1, Protocol 1 of the European Convention on Human Rights iv) To hold that the right to apply did not survive death would be in breach of Art 1 Protocol 1 v) the… [read post]
23 Jun 2010, 2:50 am
(The Knowsley argument, paralleling the finding on assured tenants on Knowsley Housing Trust v White, link to our report) ii) Brent v Knightley was wrongly decided, such that the right to apply under s.85 Housing Act 1985 survived the (ex) tenant's death iii) Such a right to apply is a possession under article 1, Protocol 1 of the European Convention on Human Rights iv) To hold that the right to apply did not survive death would be in breach of Art 1 Protocol 1 v) the… [read post]
12 Nov 2014, 6:23 am
State v. [read post]
9 Jun 2014, 5:56 am
District Court for the District of New Jersey) (employee had reasonable expectation of privacy in password-protected work computer); Brown–Criscuolo v. [read post]
29 Jan 2016, 1:49 pm
Brown/Welch v. [read post]
7 Dec 2020, 1:39 pm
Seattle Schools and Grutter v. [read post]
18 Apr 2018, 7:15 am
As with other iconic Supreme Court cases, such as Brown v. [read post]
6 May 2016, 10:15 am
Or Washington v. [read post]
27 Jul 2016, 2:15 pm
In Atwater v. [read post]
8 Nov 2023, 4:00 am
For example, self-styled originalists who don't want to be seen as rejecting Brown v. [read post]
26 Feb 2010, 1:05 pm
For example, the ideals articulated in Brown v. [read post]
