Search for: "Does 1 - 23" Results 8501 - 8520 of 15,450
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Oct 2017, 3:35 pm by Lyle Denniston
   Under the ban as Mattis adopted it, discharges could begin as early as next March 23; that part of the ban is now on hold. [read post]
2 Aug 2012, 11:38 pm by Kevin LaCroix
Accordingly the recovery does not negate the inference that [plaintiff] has suffered an economic loss. [read post]
11 Oct 2013, 7:30 am by Daniel E. Walters
  The second week saw the production decrease to a trickle: 23 pages per day. [read post]
3 Mar 2009, 11:16 pm
Thus the majority concludes that a threat of FDA enforcement action does not result in preemption by reason of impossibility. [read post]
15 May 2012, 12:34 am by Otto Spijkers
’[17] Pursuant to this approach, the New Agenda thus contained a section on Africa’s own responsibilities and commitments, and a section on the responsibilities and commitments – primarily obligations to assist Africa - of the international community as a whole.[18] The New Agenda does not appear to be so drastically different from the Programme of Action adopted earlier. [read post]
20 Sep 2021, 6:53 am by Cinthia Macie
 The Court does not find that it is impossible; only that Epic Games failed in its burden to demonstrate Apple is an illegal monopolist.[1] Epic’s principal theory was that Apple was the monopolist in each of two “aftermarkets” consisting of: (1) the distribution of iOS apps; and (2) payment processing for in-app purchases in iOS apps.[2]  Such antitrust claims, which assert a manufacturer’s monopoly over aftermarket services provided for… [read post]
1 Oct 2019, 6:23 am by Carolina Attorneys
Following the Neglect Adjudication, on 9 November 2011, the Child Custody Action was administratively removed from the active court calendar and ordered closed by the Forsyth County District Court on 1 The Record before us does not contain the Juvenile Petition, the subsequent Neglect Adjudication, or other contemporaneous documents. [read post]
2 Sep 2022, 5:01 am by Eugene Volokh
"[1] Indeed, as noted above, the right of access to court records[2]—and, in the view of many courts, the right of access to parties' names—is a "clear and strong First Amendment interest. [read post]
21 Jun 2013, 12:30 pm by Amy Howe
   The Court called for the views of the Solicitor General on October 1, 2012, and the Solicitor General filed his brief on May 23, 2012. [read post]