Search for: "Marks v. State "
Results 8501 - 8520
of 21,695
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Jun 2011, 2:04 am
Hills v Bitek at [43] – [55] to Sports Warehouse v Fry at [26] – [40]) , even though the school of thought favouring the “practically certain” or “clear” standard was imported from the Patents Act. [read post]
19 Dec 2008, 9:55 am
. #9 et al v. [read post]
30 May 2017, 7:09 am
Check out this order, Motamedi v. [read post]
13 Jun 2012, 1:26 pm
In contrast to the United States, treble (or multiple) damages are not available. [read post]
21 Oct 2021, 12:36 pm
See United States v. [read post]
13 Mar 2017, 3:07 am
MARQUES Class 46 (trade marks) * EUIPO “smart-seals” (?) [read post]
25 Apr 2013, 6:56 am
In Boice v. [read post]
3 Feb 2017, 6:42 am
" The Court of Appeals determined that New York common law does not recognise a "public performance right" in their decision in Flo & Eddie v. [read post]
18 Feb 2015, 3:33 am
Bison Designs LLC v. [read post]
31 Mar 2018, 8:52 pm
" That's how Assistant United States Attorney Molissa Farber characterized the Ancient Coin Collectors Guild's (ACCG) latest argument before the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals in the Baltimore test case.Both the ACCG and federal government offered oral arguments to the appeals court on March 22, marking the case's ninth year winding through the court system.Listen to the arguments presented in U.S. v. [read post]
25 Mar 2024, 6:38 pm
” Mark Sherman of The Associated Press reports that “Supreme Court again confronts the issue of abortion, this time over access to widely used medication. [read post]
10 Jun 2014, 11:43 am
ReynoldsTobacco Co v FDA) and Australia’s existing PP laws are being challenged before the WIPO on the basis of infringement of IP rights contained in international treaties such as TRIPS, in particularArticle 15(4): “the nature of the goods to which a trademark is to be applied shall in no case form an obstacle to the registration of the mark. [read post]
17 Sep 2014, 9:43 pm
A Three Judge Bench of the Supreme Court has comprehensively decided on "court" in the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 in the case of State of West Bengal v. [read post]
1 Jun 2020, 9:30 pm
Gideon v. [read post]
9 Jul 2022, 6:01 am
Peter Margulies explained the Supreme Court’s decision in Biden v. [read post]
8 Jul 2013, 10:09 pm
This, however, does not mark the end of human rights litigation – the plaintiffs are rather expected to resort to alternative grounds in order to support their claim (such as federal common law or the respective conflict of law rules of the states). [read post]
19 Sep 2013, 9:53 am
[The expert] testified that it was neither standard nor appropriate to look physician by physician.Id. at 30 (citation and quotation marks omitte [read post]
7 Jun 2011, 11:06 am
Co. v. [read post]
4 Oct 2018, 7:30 am
Alliant-v-Tribal-Complaint [read post]
12 May 2015, 10:58 am
In State v. [read post]
