Search for: "People v. Tooks" Results 8501 - 8520 of 12,220
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Apr 2012, 8:23 am by INFORRM
The decision in R (Guardian News and Media Ltd) v City of Westminster Magistrates Court ([2012] EWCA Civ 420) established in common law for the first time the right of ordinary people and the media to obtain documents that are used in court cases. [read post]
3 Apr 2012, 6:29 am by admin
  For more than a quarter of a century, I’ve been baffled as to why rent control hasn’t been declared Unconstitutional, but it took until just recently, with James Harmon’s lawsuit against New York City, for me to read the critical Supreme Court decision, Yee v. [read post]
1 Apr 2012, 2:20 pm by Prof. Rick Sander, guest-blogging
On the other hand, I can see why students took offense at what was reported of a professor’s work. [read post]
1 Apr 2012, 4:21 am by INFORRM
A public hearing took place on 26 March 2012 (see our post of 27 March 2012) and the order was continued by Mr Justice Tugendhat. [read post]
30 Mar 2012, 8:25 am
 Under such a principle, if Congress simply wants to encourage market activity, it must use prohibitions of the Wickard v. [read post]
30 Mar 2012, 8:01 am by Pratt Judith
You should also make the information available to the people of your organization. [read post]
30 Mar 2012, 4:23 am
One case where the Court has shared its insight into the foundation of a larceny crime as it pertains to "owner" was People v. [read post]
29 Mar 2012, 2:32 pm by John Steele
(Thanks for Eric Goldman) Introductory grafs:  Roland Vincent, a law school graduate with a long-inactive license to practice in Nevada (and no admission to the California Bar), agreed to assist acquaintances in California with their California legal problems, and took money from them for that purpose. [read post]
29 Mar 2012, 7:24 am by INFORRM
Bearing in mind the seriousness of the allegation, and the the fact that The People has a circulation of about half a million copies and an estimated readership of 1,200,000, the Judge took the view that the appropriate starting point was £150,000 [41]. [read post]
29 Mar 2012, 3:45 am by Susan Brenner
Ultimately, [LaBrie] removed the `tags’ that identify people in photos on Facebook and later took down the photos. [read post]