Search for: "State v. Bodi"
Results 8501 - 8520
of 14,867
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Dec 2013, 8:17 am
Affirmed.Case Name: LASHAWN SIDNEY KING v. [read post]
18 Dec 2013, 9:00 pm
., L.P. et al. v. [read post]
18 Dec 2013, 6:24 am
Category: Recent Decisions;Medical Malpractice Opinions Body: SC18845 - Milliun v. [read post]
17 Dec 2013, 1:03 pm
The questions were asked as a part of Caronia v. [read post]
17 Dec 2013, 10:30 am
However, more recent rulings, including Alden v. [read post]
17 Dec 2013, 4:00 am
York v Mills, 250 AD2d 122, leave to appeal denied 93 NY2d 803, the Appellate Division noted that “no local legislative body is empowered to enact laws or regulations which supersede State statutes, particularly with regard to the maintenance, support or administration of the educational system. [read post]
16 Dec 2013, 1:23 pm
This Kat calls on all able-bodied potential candidates to get writing -- particularly those from that faraway place called The Rest of the World.Deadline extended! [read post]
16 Dec 2013, 1:04 pm
Jones v. [read post]
16 Dec 2013, 6:41 am
Category: Recent Decisions;Habeas Opinions Body: AC34428 - Martinez v. [read post]
16 Dec 2013, 6:36 am
Moreover, with respect to that one of the two options a RFRA claim is virtually foreclosed by the Court’s unanimous 1982 decision in United States v. [read post]
16 Dec 2013, 6:04 am
Category: Recent Decisions;Criminal Opinions Body: SC18926 - State v. [read post]
16 Dec 2013, 2:40 am
The court noted that '(a)lthough minor, (spitting) is an application of force to the body of the victim, a bodily contact highly offensive...' 183 Misc2d at 834, citing United States v. [read post]
16 Dec 2013, 1:16 am
Here is the body of the post: Most states criminalize zoophilia and in many places the bans have been enacted quite recently. [read post]
15 Dec 2013, 4:19 pm
These sources clearly show that a “recess” took place only between the formal sessions of a legislative body. [read post]
15 Dec 2013, 2:21 pm
The missing reference is John Vallamattom v. [read post]
15 Dec 2013, 9:42 am
Hankston v. [read post]
15 Dec 2013, 5:30 am
"Detailed analysis of Federal Circuit hearing in Oracle v. [read post]
13 Dec 2013, 9:54 am
And today’s case is the goose—an order denying the manufacturer’s motion to dismiss as “premature” even though the plaintiff alleged treatment with a PMA device.In Frederick v. [read post]
12 Dec 2013, 12:57 pm
State Bd. of Educ. v. [read post]
12 Dec 2013, 7:12 am
This combination means that many state regulatory bodies can, accidentally or on purpose, act in ways that infringe on plan sponsors’ express rights under ERISA to be free of state regulation with regard to their employee benefit plans. [read post]
