Search for: "State v. C. S. S. B."
Results 8501 - 8520
of 15,310
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Apr 2014, 3:31 pm
State 636 So.2d 144 (1st DCA 1994). [read post]
19 Apr 2014, 3:31 pm
State 636 So.2d 144 (1st DCA 1994). [read post]
19 Apr 2014, 5:58 am
Davis v. [read post]
17 Apr 2014, 12:50 pm
In People v. [read post]
17 Apr 2014, 8:16 am
“Insignificant” means differences which are “so insignificant that they may go unnoticed by the average consumer”, the Court of Justice of the European Union’s (CJEU) identity test in Case C-291/00 LTJ Diffusion. [read post]
17 Apr 2014, 4:00 am
(b) Inadvertent Disclosure. [read post]
16 Apr 2014, 10:50 am
Simply stated: “[a] collateral attack is not a substitute for an appeal” reasoned the Second Appellate District Court in Bowman v. [read post]
15 Apr 2014, 7:46 am
., Inc. v. [read post]
14 Apr 2014, 1:52 pm
Simply stated: “[a] collateral attack is not a substitute for an appeal” reasoned the Second Appellate District Court in Bowman v. [read post]
13 Apr 2014, 4:01 pm
To be on the safe side, the Bundesgerichtshof decided to stay the proceedings and referred the following question to the Court for a preliminary ruling:‘Is Article 5(3) of Regulation … 44/2001 to be interpreted as meaning that the harmful event occurred in one Member State (Member State A) if the tort or delict which forms the subject-matter of the proceedings or from which claims are derived was committed in another Member State (Member State… [read post]
13 Apr 2014, 2:43 pm
Maidani, B. [read post]
13 Apr 2014, 8:59 am
For example, the US Congress,[2] the European Union[3] and its member states including the UK[4] and Ireland,[5] Australia[6] and others have been re-examining their copyright laws in light of the challenges posed by digital technologies. [read post]
11 Apr 2014, 9:48 am
ERDELYI v. [read post]
11 Apr 2014, 7:41 am
See United States v. [read post]
11 Apr 2014, 7:41 am
©Kevin C. [read post]
11 Apr 2014, 7:41 am
©Kevin C. [read post]
11 Apr 2014, 7:38 am
§522(e), which states that any exemption waiver signed by a debtor in favor of an unsecured claimholder is unenforceable in the debtor’s bankruptcy case, as is any waiver of the debtor’s right to avoid a judicial lien under §522(f). [read post]
11 Apr 2014, 7:36 am
McCall’s son sued the United States under the Federal Tort Claims Act, as Mrs. [read post]
11 Apr 2014, 4:33 am
The thought behind this was that if the parties could not agree which medical professional was going to govern the case then the government would decide, thus cutting down on litigation, ergo costs, and resulting in less dispute.The theory didn't translate into practice and one of the more common complaints I hear as I travel the state is that the QME process a) doesn't work as intended, b) is not timely, c) doesn't have enough physicians who know what… [read post]
10 Apr 2014, 11:58 am
Two FDA pregnancy categories were at issue in Czimmer, categories C and D.According to information available on the FDA’s website, “[i]n 1979, the A, B, C, D, and X category classification that is based on the adverse events and potential benefits of a particular drug was implemented in the United States in order to standardize pregnancy labeling. [read post]
