Search for: "Does 1 - 29"
Results 8521 - 8540
of 13,860
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Aug 2013, 1:28 pm
While section 812.015(1)(d) defined retail theft, it does not provide for any specific punishment for retail theft, nor does it designate a felony or a misdemeanor. [read post]
9 Aug 2013, 6:46 am
That decision drew on 29 CFR Sec. 825.302, which limited an employer’s rights in that regard. [read post]
8 Aug 2013, 10:37 pm
You can read my criticisms below his comments: 1. [read post]
8 Aug 2013, 6:40 pm
CLS Bank Int'l, at *1-2. [read post]
8 Aug 2013, 2:42 pm
Fifth, on 29 January 1990, in Kings County, for offense of PL 110/265.02[1] Attempted Criminal Possession of a Weapon in the 3rd Degree, a class E felony and sentenced to five years probation. [read post]
7 Aug 2013, 8:34 pm
State capitalism masks but does not solve the central problem of Marxism—not capital but labor. [read post]
6 Aug 2013, 10:05 pm
According to the center’s report, beginning Nov. 1, a family of three will see a reduction of about $29 a month — $319 for the remaining 11 months of the next fiscal year. [read post]
6 Aug 2013, 8:36 am
Although Gevo does not appear to concede the issue, Gevo does not argue that Butamax's use of the L. grayi enzyme literally infringes independent claim 1 of the '375 patent. [read post]
6 Aug 2013, 8:00 am
” What does this word mean? [read post]
5 Aug 2013, 11:25 am
July 29, 2013) (thanks to the Media Law Resource Center for the pointer). [read post]
5 Aug 2013, 10:25 am
Two federal Courts of Appeals have now held 2-1 that the First Amendment does not protect Electronic Arts’ depiction of actual college players, so that EA may be held liable under state right of publicity laws. [read post]
5 Aug 2013, 5:51 am
, constitute communication to the public within the meaning of Article 3(1) of Directive 2001/29/EC, even where that other person's work is not thereby communicated to a new public and the communication of the work does not use a specific technical means which differs from that of the original communication? [read post]
4 Aug 2013, 8:32 pm
Id.at *1. [read post]
4 Aug 2013, 10:39 am
The cases are also reminiscent of Doe v. [read post]
4 Aug 2013, 6:43 am
He sought their return, their exclusion as evidence in his upcoming state criminal trial, dismissal of criminal charges against him and millions of dollars in damages.In Doe v. [read post]
2 Aug 2013, 7:21 pm
Jul. 29, 2013) [read post]
2 Aug 2013, 12:43 pm
As a matter of inferential logic, doing something as though A were true does not preclude A from being true. [read post]
2 Aug 2013, 5:51 am
While the romance does not violate any rules, it has raised concerns among some good government groups. [read post]
2 Aug 2013, 5:00 am
Rose, slip op. at 1-2. [read post]
31 Jul 2013, 2:43 pm
It was that article, and not I, that reported (1) that "United States companies — most of them small or medium-sized — spent $29 billion in 2011 on patent assertion cases," (2) that, "only about $6 billion of that money wound up in the hands of inventors,” and (3) that "As for the other $23 billion, most of it goes to legal expenses..." [read post]
