Search for: "Marks v. State "
Results 8521 - 8540
of 21,695
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Dec 2009, 12:44 pm
 Arguing on behalf of respondent Karen Wilson, Mark T. [read post]
3 Mar 2007, 4:06 pm
Grants Washington State Grange v. [read post]
14 Aug 2021, 12:13 pm
LLC v. [read post]
23 Jul 2013, 8:43 am
”Carnegie Mellon U niv. v. [read post]
25 Jan 2016, 5:00 am
As to the former, Embarcadero failed to allege that the challenged mark is Embarcadero's identity or "persona" (See Hornby v. [read post]
27 Nov 2017, 6:45 am
Judge Mark L. [read post]
15 Oct 2013, 2:05 pm
State, 600 So.2d 967 (Miss. 1992); Martin v. [read post]
10 May 2011, 2:31 am
In La Quinta Worldwide, Complainant owns the LA QUINTA mark; the disputed domain name is .The undisputed facts show that Complainant is a large and well-known United States company operating in the hotel industry. [read post]
16 Feb 2011, 6:52 am
Nevertheless, the newspaper repeated the defamation: in an article alongside a photograph of Watters the newspaper had stated: We may have to apologise to this revolting pervert but will we mean it? [read post]
4 Apr 2016, 2:35 pm
The court excluded a number of other items that the State sought to introduce.People v. [read post]
8 Oct 2019, 4:07 am
” Mark Walsh has a first-hand view of all three of yesterday’s arguments for this blog. [read post]
27 Nov 2011, 3:36 pm
Cox v. [read post]
7 Jan 2009, 9:48 am
* McVey v. [read post]
12 Nov 2013, 6:31 am
Corp. v. [read post]
22 Sep 2020, 4:45 pm
(quotation marks omitted). [read post]
1 Jun 2018, 2:17 pm
In the face of a similar First Amendment challenge, the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, in U.S. v. [read post]
16 Dec 2016, 9:16 am
Related Cases: White v. [read post]
28 Sep 2021, 2:53 am
See Jacobson v. [read post]
13 Jul 2007, 7:11 am
Other acts of constitutional hardball, like the Supreme Court's decision in Bush v. [read post]
30 Apr 2010, 3:29 am
This marks the latest of three cases (Geico v Google and Rescuecom v Google) to have gone before a judge in the U.S., but again without a full trial on the issue of likelihood of confusion in an AdWords case. [read post]
