Search for: "Matter of Brown" Results 8521 - 8540 of 9,189
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Jan 2016, 8:28 am by Michael Dorf
That reticence led to some disagreement in the lower courts about such matters as whether laws restricting adults’ access to sex toys trigger heightened scrutiny. [read post]
16 Oct 2007, 6:17 am
At on Newcastle branch, bank staff attempted to reassure customers by even asking for deposits, yet the announcement was met with predictable bursts of laughter from the queues of patient customers.[10] Other customers inquiring into their accounts and financial statements using the Internet were blocked from logging into the website.[11] In the course of the day, Northern Rock's shares plummeted 31%, knocking £846.7 million off its market value.[12] Customers withdrew in a… [read post]
15 Mar 2007, 8:44 pm
"Most people don't realize that large pieces of coral, which have been painted brown and attached to the skull by common wood screws, can make a child look like a deer. [read post]
10 Jun 2018, 4:26 pm by INFORRM
The Panopticon Blog has considered a recent judgement involving a Facebook Fan Page handed down by the European Court of Justice, the case addresses a number of pertinent issues around the jurisdiction of data protection regulators in cross border matters and the responsibilities’ of data controllers in relation to cookies. [read post]
27 Dec 2019, 11:16 am by Robert E. Braun
The California Consumer Privacy Act (the “CCPA” or the “Act”) is a piece of consumer privacy legislation which was signed by California Governor Jerry Brown on June 28, 2018, and goes into effect on January 1, 2020. [read post]
9 Dec 2010, 1:56 pm by admin
  Yes, breaking the law is an odd role, no matter how many moral rationalizations one offers. [read post]
14 Dec 2011, 4:59 am by Legal Beagle
We all want to improve matters and to see a redefining of the acceptable parameters of behaviour within stadia and Scottish football. [read post]
22 Apr 2018, 4:31 pm by INFORRM
The high profile privacy and data protection case of Sir Cliff Richard v BBC continued before Mann J this week. [read post]
17 Feb 2010, 4:07 pm by NL
Lord Hope's main judgment, with which Lady Hale and Lord Brown agreed, traced the history of cases before and after Runa Begum. [read post]
25 Jun 2012, 7:39 am by Steve Hall
"Arkansas Court Upends Death Penalty," by Robbie Brown for the New York Times. [read post]
22 Jan 2009, 8:01 am
When asked about a matter that implicated the warrant holders' financial interest, the corporation had a duty to answer truthfully. [read post]
4 Jan 2016, 8:00 pm by John Ehrett
In its Conference of January 8, 2016, the Court will consider petitions seeking review of issues such as whether the First Amendment protects a speaker against a state-law right-of-publicity claim that challenges the realistic portrayal of a person in an expressive work, and whether a federal court of appeals has jurisdiction to review an order denying class certification after the named plaintiffs voluntarily dismiss their claims with prejudice. [read post]
25 Jul 2023, 5:55 am by Mark Nevitt
As the DOJ wrote in 1982, an Acting officer’s “stature as a practical matter is . . . somewhat inferior. [read post]
10 Dec 2013, 8:31 am by Jack Goldsmith
  With regard to (3) the 1996 Aspin-Brown Report suggested that the USG spies on foreign firms to “identify[] situations abroad where U.S. commercial firms are being placed at a competitive disadvantage as a result of unscrupulous actions, e.g. bribery and ‘kickbacks. [read post]
3 Oct 2022, 4:25 am by Peter J. Sluka
Whether motivated by tax, regulatory, or even bankruptcy concerns, the structure matters. [read post]
18 May 2015, 5:26 am by Giesela Ruehl
On the federal level, prospective overruling was used for the first time in the 1954 Brown v. [read post]
7 Jan 2009, 1:53 am
Goldman resigned from the bar in 2005 during a disciplinary investigation unrelated to the matter before Korman. [read post]
19 Apr 2011, 10:00 pm by Rosalind English
On the other hand in Lumba the Supreme Court  (in the teeth of very strong opposition from Lord Brown) concluded that, if it failed to apply its published policy,  a public authority could still be liable in tort even if its actions were not unlawful in public law terms (see our analysis of this ruling). [read post]