Search for: "Plaintiff(s)"
Results 8521 - 8540
of 178,509
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Sep 2010, 6:18 am
” Because First Colonial’s presence in the lawsuit would have destroyed diversity jurisdiction, plaintiffs argued that the case was improperly removed and that the district court lacked subject matter jurisdiction when it granted the motion to compel.The court denied plaintiffs’ motion to vacate on this basis, noting that plaintiffs were well aware of the identity of First Colonial during the arbitration, yet never objected to its absence. [read post]
24 May 2017, 4:00 am
As such, Plaintiff’s Motion In Limine to preclude that evidence was granted. [read post]
12 Apr 2023, 6:13 am
Plaintiff's Fourteenth Amendment claim will proceed to discovery because defendants are not entitled to qualified immunity. [read post]
9 Feb 2012, 7:32 pm
Here's yet another unpublished opinion in which the California Court of Appeal (Second District, Division Four) reversed a punitive damages award because the plaintiff failed to introduce meaningful evidence of the defendant's financial condition. [read post]
24 Nov 2020, 6:00 am
The proposal was, however, subject to approval by defendant’s board and the nonparty, and contingent upon defendant drawing down on the loan provided by plaintiff. [read post]
10 Jun 2014, 11:31 am
Plaintiff's subsequent Motion to Enforce was granted by the trial court. [read post]
13 Jan 2013, 7:50 pm
Click here for a copy of the Court’s certification order. [read post]
13 Jan 2013, 7:50 pm
Click here for a copy of the Court’s certification order. [read post]
9 Sep 2019, 10:01 pm
» Related StoriesCourt Grants Spoliation Sanctions for Defendant’s Failure to Preserve Photos of Prisoner Plaintiff: eDiscovery Case LawCourt Denies Dueling Sanctions Motions from Both Plaintiffs and Defendants: eDiscovery Case LawCourt Sanctions Plaintiff for Spoliation of Facebook Account: eDiscovery Case Law [read post]
20 Jul 2015, 6:27 am
On appeal, the defendant claims that the court improperly rendered judgment in favor of the plaintiff on the first count of the plaintiff's complaint, alleging fraud and deceit, because (1) the defendant is not liable to the plaintiff under any theory of fraud, (2) General Statutes §§ 52-572b and 52-572f bar the first count, and (3) the plaintiff did not commence his fraud action within the three year statute of limitations set forth in… [read post]
9 May 2017, 12:00 pm
Defamatory statements Camaj v Plassmann, 2017 NY Slip Op 03473, Appellate Division, Second DepartmentSupreme Court granted the plaintiff's motion for summary judgment for alleged liable after determining that the defendant had defamed the plaintiff by publishing false statements about him. [read post]
27 Jul 2015, 9:01 am
East Lyme Board of Education ("The plaintiff...appeals from the summary judgment rendered in favor of the defendants...in this action arising out of the termination of the plaintiff’s employment. [read post]
30 Jun 2015, 8:30 am
On appeal, the defendant claims that the trial court improperly (1) found that the defendant did not comply with the terms of the parties’ settlement agreement, (2) found that the defendant failed to prove its special defense, (3) rendered judgment in favor of the plaintiff on the first and second counts of his amended complaint, and (4) awarded damages to the plaintiff based on the cost of repair of the plaintiff’s driveway rather than the… [read post]
16 Oct 2010, 8:46 am
Adzzoo: The plaintiffs tried unsuccessfully to disqualify Locke Lord Bissell & Liddell LLP because one of the plaintiffs had ties to the defendant's law firm. [read post]
11 May 2022, 2:13 pm
From the New Hampshire Supreme Court's decision today in Banaian v. [read post]
15 Jun 2018, 7:20 am
In ruling in favor of the plaintiff, the court held that evidence of the plaintiff’s premium payments is part of the res gestae of the case. [read post]
15 Jun 2018, 7:20 am
In ruling in favor of the plaintiff, the court held that evidence of the plaintiff’s premium payments is part of the res gestae of the case. [read post]
19 Jul 2021, 9:43 am
The opinion also arguably equates a plaintiff’s substantive doctrinal harm with Article III harm. [read post]
8 Jun 2009, 4:17 am
At a hearing in late April before Southern District of New York Judge Jed Rakoff, lead plaintiff's counsel, Gene Cauley, advised "the funds are presently unavailable to be delivered," and when asked why, counsel responded by saying that "if I go into anymore detail, I think I might violate a privilege against self-incrimination. [read post]
20 Jan 2016, 6:51 am
The plaintiff has also said it has interfered with husband’s ability to live a normal life. [read post]
