Search for: "BEENE v. BEENE"
Results 8541 - 8560
of 191,853
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Nov 2006, 1:44 pm
In Doe v. [read post]
1 Nov 2011, 6:26 am
Summum and Salazar v. [read post]
28 Jan 2013, 5:00 am
In Miller v. [read post]
12 Nov 2014, 4:05 pm
As a practical matter, though, this decision probably doesn’t mean much, because the same issue has been raised in Baker v. [read post]
9 Jun 2012, 9:44 am
State v. [read post]
27 Jul 2011, 4:34 am
State v. [read post]
24 Jun 2022, 5:38 am
Scopia Windmill LP v Olshan Frome Wolosky LLP 2022 NY Slip Op 03996 Decided on June 21, 2022 Appellate Division, First Department succinctly describes how legal malpractice is a comparison of the actual outcome versus the hypothetical better outcome had mistakes not been made. [read post]
26 Jan 2018, 6:38 am
Nix v. [read post]
24 Jan 2022, 9:42 am
Once this decision had been made on the first ground, the second ground was dealt with very quickly. [read post]
30 May 2023, 6:43 am
There should have been no such temporal limitation imposed on the domestic violence evidence the mother may seek to introduce. [read post]
4 Aug 2016, 7:50 am
Members of the public are deemed to have knowledge of an agency’s administrative action that has been posted on the Internet Eskridge v Nassau County BOCES, Decisions of the Commissioner Education, Decision No. 16,932Meredith Eskridge appealed the decision of the Board of Cooperative Educational Services of Nassau County [BOCES] denial of her request to be placed on the preferred eligibility list for a position as a teacher of deaf and hard of hearing. [read post]
16 Feb 2011, 5:43 pm
See, Marlo v. [read post]
16 Nov 2011, 5:19 am
Frizado v. [read post]
27 Jan 2014, 7:41 am
This could be your chance, as Katfriend Kaori Minami (Powell Gilbert LLP) explains:Apple v Samsung in Japan: an update -- and the Japanese version of an amicus briefIt has been reported that, on 23 January, the Japanese Intellectual Property High Court (which, despite its name, is an appeal court) has invited the submission of amicus briefs on the FRAND issue which is at the heart of the Apple v Samsung appeal proceedings, to address the question: "Should… [read post]
10 Feb 2010, 8:44 am
The Delhi High Court delivered a landmark judgment in the case of Manushi Sangathan v. [read post]
27 Mar 2018, 9:35 am
See Trotsky v. [read post]
14 Aug 2012, 11:29 am
For the last four decades, the fight over the constitutionality of race-conscious measures to foster equality has been reduced to a sound-bite – whether the Fourteenth Amendment is “color-blind” – with conservatives claiming the mantle of Justice’ s Harlan’s dissent in Plessy v. [read post]
14 Jan 2009, 2:06 am
Here's Herring v. [read post]
11 Oct 2007, 4:18 pm
An interesting situation, if perhaps an increasingly common one, has just been set out in the Court of Appeal case of Holmes-Moorhouse v London Borough of Richmond-Upon-Thames [2007] EWCA Civ 970. [read post]
3 Dec 2014, 10:45 am
Swanson, an elementary school teacher, had recently been treated for breast cancer. [read post]
