Search for: "Fields v. A S" Results 8541 - 8560 of 17,269
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Mar 2015, 7:35 am
And that applies to the Union’s legislature, formed of the European Council and Parliament, which numerous provisions of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU) expressly require to apply the ordinary legislative procedure in adopting rules of substantive law in fields as diverse as access to documents, personal data, customs, judicial and police cooperation, economic and monetary policy, harmonisation of laws, public health, consumer law, and so on. [read post]
11 Mar 2015, 4:00 am by John Gregory
(All of the Conference’s working papers and the Uniform Act itself are on the Conference web site.) [read post]
11 Mar 2015, 1:51 am
 Yesterday we announced that Dr Danny Friedmann (IP Dragon) had agreed to field complaints from readers who feel that their blogposts have been unfairly blocked by this weblog's moderation policy (see details in the side bar feature "Want to complain? [read post]
10 Mar 2015, 1:18 pm
The Currin Court upheld the private delegation by saying it was no greater than the delegation to the President upheld in Field v. [read post]
8 Mar 2015, 5:29 am by SHG
The incident, Fitzgerald says, is based on a 2008 homicide case, State of Alabama v. [read post]
7 Mar 2015, 8:23 pm
Burwell: Alas, I find that Ilya Somin over at Volokh’s is, in the context of King v. [read post]
6 Mar 2015, 3:46 pm by Lyle Denniston
  That was the summary ruling in Baker v. [read post]
6 Mar 2015, 2:33 pm
Outros autores a desenvolveram, mas o fato é que no século XXI a formulação teórica de Von Bertalanffy, atende a várias ciências. [read post]
6 Mar 2015, 9:50 am by Old Fox
Wilson has a well-cited quote, calling the Python the "Rolls-Royce of Colt revolvers" and the well-known British author and firearms expert Ian V. [read post]
6 Mar 2015, 7:04 am
The four-part test for determining inherent distinctiveness of trade dress was set forth in Seabrook v. [read post]
6 Mar 2015, 5:30 am by The Public Employment Law Press
In the public sector the intent of parties to a collective bargaining agreement to arbitrate a particular issue may not be presumedCounty of Rockland v Corr. [read post]