Search for: "Label v Label"
Results 8541 - 8560
of 13,306
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Oct 2017, 4:27 am
On Monday, the Supreme Court granted cert. in Microsoft v. [read post]
5 Jan 2018, 5:59 am
Luxco, Inc. v. [read post]
20 Sep 2016, 11:15 am
College. v. [read post]
10 Apr 2015, 4:00 am
The Federal Court decision in Red Label Vacations Inc v 411 Travel Buys Limited 2015 FC 19 has focussed on a detailed considerations by a Canadian court of the issues of copyright and trademark infringement via the use of metatags. [read post]
7 Feb 2013, 5:00 am
” Ohler v. [read post]
2 Jul 2013, 7:49 am
It cites to the Ninth Circuit's 2001 decision in Scribner v. [read post]
6 Nov 2013, 4:37 pm
The final topic was labelled "Complexities and challenges of standardization- The operator’s panel." [read post]
13 Apr 2015, 12:41 pm
Schutte Bagclosures Inc. v. [read post]
19 Sep 2017, 7:39 am
No, the DeVOL is in the detailKatfriend Darren Meale provides an analysis of a recent decision relating to UK unregistered design rights (UKUDR): Neptune v DeVOL Kitchens [2017] EWHC 2172. [read post]
15 Jul 2013, 3:40 am
Foods, Inc. v. [read post]
23 Jul 2019, 11:29 am
LTTB LLC v. [read post]
20 Mar 2013, 1:04 pm
The background to Kirtsaeng v. [read post]
26 Jan 2023, 5:45 am
Wrote a unanimous panel of the Appellate Division, First Department court in reinstating Chontay Kirby’s first and only cause of action for discrimination in her 11-page complaint, “Although plaintiff’s first cause of action is labeled as one for ‘hostile workplace,’” the lower court “was not bound by that designation and plaintiff has sufficiently stated a cause of action for employment discrimination under both the New York State and New… [read post]
18 Nov 2014, 9:30 am
County v. [read post]
27 Oct 2020, 7:17 am
And at least one court has taken those concerns to heart, ruling in Sandvig v. [read post]
11 Apr 2014, 5:00 am
The district court’s express preemption ruling in Simoneau v. [read post]
26 Jan 2015, 5:30 am
Underwriters, Inc. v. [read post]
25 Oct 2016, 8:00 am
Considering such factors with respect to the Claimant’s relationship with the Authority, the Appellate Division held that the Board's finding that an employer-employee relationship existed between Claimant and the Housing Authority was supported by substantial evidence and declined to disturbed it.The Devore v DiNapoli Decision In Devore v DiNapoli the issue concerned the mirror image of an employer-employee relationship: service provided as an independent contractor. [read post]
24 Apr 2013, 4:50 am
Animal Legal Defense Fund v. [read post]
24 Jul 2014, 8:00 am
Zogenix, Inc. v. [read post]
