Search for: "State v House"
Results 8541 - 8560
of 28,334
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Feb 2015, 5:45 am
Ct. 1849 (2011); State v. [read post]
18 Jun 2015, 3:01 pm
Hasty, otherwise known as Turkman v. [read post]
4 Jun 2012, 4:27 am
In the case of Lawrence v Texas, the U.S. [read post]
5 Mar 2013, 6:24 am
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Nevada. [read post]
20 Feb 2011, 1:24 pm
Article 8 did not require contracting states to make suitable sites available to gypsies (Chapman v UK). [read post]
27 May 2011, 8:01 am
In Meiklejohn v. [read post]
30 May 2007, 3:00 am
U.S. v. [read post]
16 Jul 2010, 1:15 am
Hall & Ors v Mayor of London (On Behalf of the Greater London Authority) [2010] EWCA Civ 817 (16 July 2010) – read judgment The Mayor of London has won a court order to evict a camp of protesters from Parliament Square, with the Court of Appeal upholding a decision of the High Court stating that the Mayor’s response to the protest was proportionate and not a breach of the protesters’ human rights. [read post]
28 Jun 2019, 11:01 am
Common Cause and Lamone v. [read post]
23 Mar 2011, 4:20 am
The complaint (full text) in Westminster Presbyterian Church v. [read post]
27 May 2020, 2:33 pm
[In Timbs v. [read post]
9 Sep 2010, 3:57 am
Alcoholism as a defense in a disciplinary actionMurolo v Safir, Appellate Division, 246 A.D.2d 653, Leave to appeal denied, 91 N.Y.2d 813In McEniry v Landi, 84 NY2d 554, the Court of Appeals said that alcoholism qualifies as a disability within the meaning of the State’s Human Rights Law [Section 292.21, Executive Law]. [read post]
30 Mar 2018, 11:10 am
In the 2011 Supreme Court ruling of Brown v. [read post]
29 Oct 2012, 6:34 am
Solicitor General to provide the government’s views on whether the federal Fair Housing Act of 1968 covers claims that a housing policy had a more negative impact on minority renters or buyers, even if there was no intentional discrimination. [read post]
14 Jun 2010, 10:00 pm
Mitty J surveyed the various tests for proportionality, articulated in the common law (by Lord Clyde in de Freitas v Permanent Secretary of Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries, Lands and Housing [1991] 1 AC 69; in Strasbourg (Sporrong & Lönnroth v Sweden [1982] 5 EHRR 35) and James v United Kingdom [1986] 8EHRR 123. [read post]
15 Mar 2017, 4:33 pm
First, as to the general availability of Bivens remedies, in Hernandez v. [read post]
16 Jan 2016, 8:00 pm
Bethune-Hill v. [read post]
2 Apr 2014, 6:02 am
By Sara Hutchins Jodka In Burns v. [read post]
20 Dec 2013, 8:53 am
Trustees of the California State University, S199557. [read post]
7 Mar 2016, 1:55 am
* The UK Implements the Unitary Patent - Statutory Instrument passedDarren and his colleague Robert Barker pen a detailed post upon the Statutory Instrument that will implement the Unitary Patent and Unified Patent Court in UK law, which was approved by the House of Commons on 1 March and the House of Lords on 2 March. [read post]
