Search for: "State v. Bodi"
Results 8541 - 8560
of 14,870
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Dec 2013, 2:55 am
A. v Secretary of State for the Home Department. [read post]
5 Dec 2013, 2:55 am
A. v Secretary of State for the Home Department. [read post]
4 Dec 2013, 9:24 am
Case citation: The Authors’ Guild, Inc. v. [read post]
4 Dec 2013, 8:51 am
The Supreme Court reminds us of this principle in a case that was so clear to them that they ruled upon without oral argument.The case is Stanton v. [read post]
4 Dec 2013, 6:44 am
See Barhoumi v. [read post]
2 Dec 2013, 8:15 pm
As a matter of fact, it assimilates the physical differences among persons with disabilities with the main stream of the society by casting obligation on the State to modify the so-called "able-bodied" norm.In my next piece, I will demonstrate how the Indian judiciary has incorporated this principle into its equality jurisprudence with special reference to public employment.Guest Post by Dr. [read post]
2 Dec 2013, 12:08 pm
Inman v. [read post]
2 Dec 2013, 9:36 am
But see United States v. [read post]
2 Dec 2013, 4:43 am
Wisconsin v. [read post]
29 Nov 2013, 4:32 pm
In United States v. [read post]
29 Nov 2013, 5:51 am
Category: Recent Decisions;Criminal Opinions Body: AC33550 - State v. [read post]
29 Nov 2013, 5:10 am
Similarities can be drawn with the recent case of Fenty v Arcadia Group Brands Ltd (t/a Topshop) [discussed by the IPKat here] in which the pop star Rihanna succeeded in her claim for passing off against the retail moguls Topshop, who used her image on a T-shirt without her permission (although Topshop thought they were on solid ground by getting a licence from the photographer to use the picture). [read post]
29 Nov 2013, 2:44 am
On Wednesday (December 4, 2013), the Washington, DC-based United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit will hold the long-awaited Oracle v. [read post]
28 Nov 2013, 6:27 am
If it is found that the third parties in this case were negligent then the respondent will be liable under its non-delegable duty of care to the appellant. [1] Brown v Nelson & Ors [1971] LGR 20 [2] Gold v Essex County Council [1942] 2 KB 293, 301 [3] Cassidy v Ministry of Health [1951] 2 KB 343 [4] A (Child) v Ministry of Defence [2005] QB 183, 47 per Lord Phillips of Worth [read post]
28 Nov 2013, 6:27 am
If it is found that the third parties in this case were negligent then the respondent will be liable under its non-delegable duty of care to the appellant. [1] Brown v Nelson & Ors [1971] LGR 20 [2] Gold v Essex County Council [1942] 2 KB 293, 301 [3] Cassidy v Ministry of Health [1951] 2 KB 343 [4] A (Child) v Ministry of Defence [2005] QB 183, 47 per Lord Phillips of Worth [read post]
27 Nov 2013, 6:36 am
He worried about what would happen if a vacancy happened during the Senate’s session, but was not discovered until after the Senate recessed, or about “the sudden dissolution of that body by some convulsion of nature; the falling of the building in which they hold their sessions; a sudden and destructive pestilence, disabling or destroying a quorum of that body. [read post]
26 Nov 2013, 1:00 pm
Three updates in Aamer v. [read post]
26 Nov 2013, 9:46 am
Tax Court last year, O’Connor v. [read post]
26 Nov 2013, 2:12 am
In Commonwealth v. [read post]
25 Nov 2013, 2:56 pm
In Adoptive Couple v. [read post]
