Search for: "State v. Law"
Results 8541 - 8560
of 173,921
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Aug 2023, 9:02 am
Case Citation: Johnson v. [read post]
10 Aug 2023, 8:02 am
See United States v. [read post]
10 Aug 2023, 7:41 am
In PACCAR Inc & Ors v Competition Appeal Tribunal & Ors, four out of five justices ruled that such agreements fall within the statutory definition of damages-based agreements (DBAs). [read post]
10 Aug 2023, 6:04 am
"] From Judge Joseph Bataillon's decision Tuesday in Straka v. [read post]
10 Aug 2023, 5:38 am
Although ICJ decisions lack formal precedential effect, I agree with Jamshidi that the ICJ’s decision in Jurisdictional Immunities of the State (Germany v. [read post]
10 Aug 2023, 5:34 am
The Law Offices of Leah V. [read post]
10 Aug 2023, 5:00 am
When that case was dismissed on October 25, 2019, by the Kings County Supreme Court -- because RD failed to show that he sustained a “serious injury,” as defined by the state’s Insurance Law -- an appeal was filed.On its review, the Appellate Division, Second Department, noted that RD failed to competently rebut the findings of the defendants’ experts that the purported injuries “to the cervical and lumbar regions of the plaintiff's spine, his… [read post]
10 Aug 2023, 3:43 am
An amendment to the National Environmental Management: Waste Act 2008 in the National Environmental Laws Amendment Act 2022 was declared invalid and unconstitutional because the State had failed to comply with its constitutional obligations to facilitate public involvement in the legislation. [read post]
10 Aug 2023, 3:40 am
This just in: Journal of Law and Public Policy Fall 2023 Symposium Topic: Free Speech and the United States Constitution Date: November 17, 2023 (speakers are welcome to participate in-person or by Zoom) University of St. [read post]
10 Aug 2023, 3:00 am
This case is a good example of why states need good common law and statutes protecting policyholders from bad acting insurance companies. [read post]
10 Aug 2023, 12:15 am
Limited v. [read post]
9 Aug 2023, 10:24 pm
Tex. 1969); United States v. [read post]
9 Aug 2023, 6:00 pm
The transfer of EPCS for initial dispensing is permissible only if allowable under existing State or other applicable law. [read post]
9 Aug 2023, 3:17 pm
Oklahoma; Self Defense) United States v. [read post]
9 Aug 2023, 2:54 pm
See Teter v. [read post]
California Court of Appeal Holds That Unexpected Work Expenses May Be Reimbursable Continue Reading…
9 Aug 2023, 1:51 pm
The California Court of Appeal for the First Appellate District recently issued its opinion regarding business-related expenses in Thai v. [read post]
9 Aug 2023, 1:36 pm
[3] United States v. [read post]
9 Aug 2023, 11:54 am
I’ve written before about NJ law around cohabitation and ending alimony. [read post]
9 Aug 2023, 10:34 am
Supreme Court’s overturning of Roe v. [read post]
9 Aug 2023, 10:26 am
Indeed, in McDonald’s II, the court reached back before Caremark to the 1963 Delaware Supreme Court decision in Graham v. [read post]
