Search for: "California v. Law"
Results 8561 - 8580
of 33,836
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Feb 2019, 11:27 am
H.R.1031: To take certain land located in San Diego County, California, into trust for the benefit of the Pala Band of Mission Indians, and for other purposes. [read post]
8 Feb 2019, 11:27 am
H.R.1031: To take certain land located in San Diego County, California, into trust for the benefit of the Pala Band of Mission Indians, and for other purposes. [read post]
8 Feb 2019, 7:12 am
Rusis, et al v. [read post]
8 Feb 2019, 6:23 am
Now, in Gilberg v. [read post]
7 Feb 2019, 9:01 pm
In reaching this result, the Grutter Court relied heavily on Justice Lewis Powell’s writing 25 years earlier in Regents of the University of California v. [read post]
7 Feb 2019, 4:42 pm
On February 4, 2019, the California Court of Appeal, Second District issued a 2-1 decision in Ward v. [read post]
7 Feb 2019, 3:18 pm
For nearly all that time, the firm also has written Miller & Starr, California Real Estate 4th, a 12-volume treatise on California real estate law. [read post]
7 Feb 2019, 9:17 am
Long before the elections of 2016, the American Republic had been moving toward more formal and open hostilities in the cultural civil war, one with social, economic, cultural and political consequences, that was one of the great consequences of the immediate post 1945 period. [read post]
7 Feb 2019, 8:06 am
(BREAKING - 3rd DCA Grants Writ of Cert in State v. [read post]
7 Feb 2019, 8:00 am
Supreme Court ruled in Miranda v. [read post]
7 Feb 2019, 8:00 am
Supreme Court ruled in Miranda v. [read post]
6 Feb 2019, 1:15 pm
Representatives from California (all of them Democrats) and seven Republican Congressmen (from Texas, Florida, Colorado, and North Carolina) submitted statements.Then there were some NGO submissions supporting Qualcomm, one submission by multiple NGOs supporting Apple and Intel, and a few letters from people who personally know J. [read post]
6 Feb 2019, 10:54 am
In Gilberg v. [read post]
6 Feb 2019, 9:24 am
The California Supreme Court ruled in the 2008 case of Ross v. [read post]
6 Feb 2019, 8:47 am
Background: The case is Pena v. [read post]
6 Feb 2019, 6:12 am
| The IP term (thus far) of the millennium: the curious story of the adoption of "patent troll" and "internet trolling" | No pain, no gain: Plausibility in Warner-Lambert v Actavis | Testing the boundaries of subjectivity: Infringement of Swiss-type claims in Warner-Lambert v Actavis | Is SPINNING generic? [read post]
6 Feb 2019, 2:00 am
Under the common law rule for aiding and abetting, as described in Austin B. v. [read post]
5 Feb 2019, 2:03 pm
At the recent FTC v. [read post]
5 Feb 2019, 1:18 pm
On February 4, 2019, a divided panel of the California Court of Appeal issued their majority and dissenting opinion in Ward v. [read post]
5 Feb 2019, 12:44 pm
In Gilberg v California Check Cashing Stores LLC, the court held that an employer violates the FCRA by including, in a pre-background check notice form, information about a job applicant’s rights under various state laws. [read post]
