Search for: "Liable Defendant(s)" Results 8561 - 8580 of 21,115
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 May 2017, 7:02 am by Michael Ascher
” When underage drinking is done in a motor vehicle, the court is also required to suspend the defendants driving privileges for 6 months. [read post]
” In granting summary judgment for defendants, the district court had held that a third party who was not the plaintiff’s direct employer could only be liable for “aiding and abetting” discrimination if the third party and the direct employer were “joint employers. [read post]
10 May 2017, 6:17 am by Associates and Bruce L. Scheiner
Utility defendant moved for summary judgment, arguing it owed the boy no duty of care as a matter of law under the state’s recreational use statute – even though the family paid a $50 entrance fee. [read post]
10 May 2017, 4:38 am by INFORRM
So, where a person voluntarily republishes a defamatory statement without the original publisher’s authority, the general rule is that no liability will attach to the defendant for that republication. [read post]
9 May 2017, 4:30 pm by INFORRM
An articulate challenge to God is not gross abuse or insult to a religion; controversy is not outrage; and candidly defending atheism is not intentionally causing outrage. [read post]
9 May 2017, 12:00 pm by The Public Employment Law Press
Defamatory statements Camaj v Plassmann, 2017 NY Slip Op 03473, Appellate Division, Second DepartmentSupreme Court granted the plaintiff's motion for summary judgment for alleged liable after determining that the defendant had defamed the plaintiff by publishing false statements about him. [read post]
9 May 2017, 3:56 am by Michael Bertoncini
The court also found that by accessing the company’s protected network to artificially inflate his hours and by participating in the conspiracy to hack the company’s systems, the Defendant was liable for violations of the Computer Fraud Abuse Act, the Stored Communications Act, the California Computer Data Access and Fraud Act, and the California Uniform Trade Secrets Act. [read post]
8 May 2017, 5:14 pm by Kevin LaCroix
But while their authority is sufficient under Park for them to be held criminally liable, such a “crime” — they argue — may not lawfully be punished by deprivation of the liberty of the defendant. [read post]
8 May 2017, 12:43 pm by Mona Fang and Aaron Rubin
” Similarly, in CoStar, the Fourth Circuit found the defendant ISP not liable for direct copyright infringement based on its subscribers’ posting of copyrighted photographs on its website. [read post]
8 May 2017, 6:00 am by blackfin
These include, but are not limited to: The extent of the defendants actions. [read post]
8 May 2017, 6:00 am by blackfin
These include, but are not limited to: The extent of the defendants actions. [read post]
8 May 2017, 6:00 am by blackfin
These include, but are not limited to: The extent of the defendants actions. [read post]
8 May 2017, 6:00 am by blackfin
These include, but are not limited to: The extent of the defendants actions. [read post]
8 May 2017, 6:00 am by blackfin
These include, but are not limited to: The extent of the defendants actions. [read post]
8 May 2017, 6:00 am by blackfin
These include, but are not limited to: The extent of the defendants actions. [read post]