Search for: "Test Plaintiff" Results 8561 - 8580 of 21,967
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Nov 2016, 1:26 pm by Naomi Jane Gray
”[7]  In the Tenth Circuit, a prevailing plaintiff could recover fees by showing that the defendant acted in bad faith, while a prevailing defendant had to show that (1) the plaintiff’s case lacked foundation; (2) the plaintiff brought suit in bad faith; (3) the plaintiff prosecuted the case in an “unusually vexatious and oppressive manner”; or (4) “perhaps for other reasons as well. [read post]
2 Nov 2016, 1:26 pm by Naomi Jane Gray
”[7]  In the Tenth Circuit, a prevailing plaintiff could recover fees by showing that the defendant acted in bad faith, while a prevailing defendant had to show that (1) the plaintiff’s case lacked foundation; (2) the plaintiff brought suit in bad faith; (3) the plaintiff prosecuted the case in an “unusually vexatious and oppressive manner”; or (4) “perhaps for other reasons as well. [read post]
2 Nov 2016, 12:55 pm by Michael Grossman
Once again, all conducted tests were negative for any drugs on Eckert’s person. [read post]
2 Nov 2016, 10:03 am by Jason Shinn
This lawsuit was eventually submitted to mediation, where it eventually settled with the plaintiff receiving a cash payment. [read post]
2 Nov 2016, 4:00 am by Cameron Hutchison
The Legal Test for Copyright Infringement The test for infringement is whether there has been a substantial qualitative taking of the plaintiff’s song. [read post]
1 Nov 2016, 3:08 pm by Angel Reyes III
Our Dallas personal injury lawyers have a nearly combined 100 years experience representing plaintiffs in personal injury, business, and dangerous prescription drug & device litigation. [read post]
In its opinion, the court noted: “The suggestion that such laws should cover [plaintiffs] failure to read an unambiguous tablet-count does not pass the proverbial laugh test… In sum, plaintiffs’ claims amount to ‘non-actionable puffery,’ and are unreasonable as a matter of law. [read post]
1 Nov 2016, 11:19 am by richardhunt
 There was no evidence that all the ATMs in the defendant’s system were compliant before the lawsuit was filed, and no evidence of a comprehensive policy for testing to make sure the ATMs remained compliant. [read post]
1 Nov 2016, 4:34 am by Jon Hyman
      Related StoriesWhat happens to the new FLSA salary test under President Trump? [read post]
31 Oct 2016, 7:07 am by Docket Navigator
[A]fter the jury returned a verdict, but before final judgment, the Supreme Court determined that the Federal Circuit’s two-part test for enhanced damages was inconsistent with 35 U.S.C. [read post]
31 Oct 2016, 6:18 am by Rebecca Tushnet
The Ninth Circuit’s test: “[F]irst, there must be some effect on American foreign commerce; second, the effect must be sufficiently great to present a cognizable injury to plaintiffs under the federal statute; and third, the interests of and links to American foreign commerce must be sufficiently strong in relation to those of other nations to justify an assertion of extraterritorial authority. [read post]
31 Oct 2016, 5:26 am by Jessica C. Diamond
P.B., the Appellate Division addressed the second prong of that test and the misapplication of the facts to the law that led to the trial court denying the plaintiff’s request for a Final Restraining Order. [read post]
29 Oct 2016, 11:19 am by Bill Marler
“Poisoned” explains technical details as lawyers wrangle over legal fees and doctors run tests on micro-organisms, while also weaving in the emotions of individuals and families. [read post]
28 Oct 2016, 2:39 pm by Woodruff Family Law Group
DNA tests confirmed that the plaintiff was not the father, and the mother was awarded custody of the child. [read post]
28 Oct 2016, 11:41 am by Ron Coleman
 The types of evidence to be considered in determining whether a mark is generic include: (1) dictionary definitions; (2) generic use of the term by competitors and other persons in the trade; (3) plaintiff’s own generic use; (4) generic use in the media; and (5) consumer surveys. [read post]
28 Oct 2016, 10:06 am by Gregory B. Williams
Specifically, the Court granted Defendants’ motion to sever with respect to the patent infringement claims and damages after finding that the six-factor test set forth in In Re EMC Corp., 677 F.3d 1351 (Fed. [read post]