Search for: "Thomas Long" Results 8561 - 8580 of 11,572
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 May 2009, 1:53 pm
  Indeed, one can find hints of such a position in legal scholarship as long ago as 1958, the year after James Vicary triggered a public outcry with his claim that he'd hidden subliminal messages in a movie screening promoting Coca Cola and popcorn and the year after Vance Packard described the technique in his book, The Hidden Persuaders. [read post]
4 Jun 2025, 8:48 am by John Elwood
They argue the companies were producing oil long before the war and that the government contracts never directed the specific extraction activities now at issue. [read post]
29 May 2025, 12:27 pm by John Elwood
Thomas, ever the originalist, also wrote a separate opinion that reiterated his skepticism of the seminal student-speech case Tinker v. [read post]
23 Jul 2013, 2:48 am by Brian Tamanaha
The credibility of their study rests entirely upon this claim.All their talk of “historic norms,” however, is puffed up exaggeration: 16 years is neither “long” nor remotely enough time to establish “historic norms. [read post]
5 Feb 2011, 10:22 am by Steve Bainbridge
The social obligation of business is to sustainably maximize long-term profits for shareholders. [read post]
29 Apr 2022, 7:54 am by Gus Hurwitz
The second article evaluated and rejected the FTC’s long-held belief that the Federal Trade Commission’s (FTC) interpretations of the FTC Act do not receive Chevron deference. [read post]
16 Apr 2018, 4:11 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Thomas says strict scrutiny even if it’s commercial; etc. [read post]
31 Jul 2020, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
  Lengthy dissents and concurrences form Justices Thomas and Alito suggest deep fissures in the conservative camp that render Tushnet’s account of the Roberts Court’s master strategy less persuasive. [read post]
14 Jul 2015, 6:00 am by Guest Blogger
” Or a “No Harm Clause” conferring on all citizens a right to “do their thing” as long as they do no harm to anyone else in the process. [read post]
19 Jan 2011, 6:02 am by stevemehta
Mehta The long awaited Cassel decision has now come down this last week. [read post]
2 May 2022, 10:51 am by Eugene Volokh
Not just the content of a flag, but also its presence and position have long conveyed important messages about government…. [read post]
4 Nov 2022, 4:00 am by Jim Sedor
Trump attorney Kenneth Chesebro contended Thomas would be “our only chance to get a favorable judicial opinion by Jan. 6, which might hold up the Georgia count in Congress. [read post]
29 Jun 2023, 7:49 am by Public Employment Law Press
On June 29, 2023 the Supreme Court held that colleges and universities making "admission decisions" that relied, in part, on racial considerations violated the Constitution of the United States. [read post]
29 Jun 2023, 7:49 am by Public Employment Law Press
On June 29, 2023 the Supreme Court held that colleges and universities making "admission decisions" that relied, in part, on racial considerations violated the Constitution of the United States. [read post]
8 Dec 2021, 5:21 am
 The extraordinary  Ngoc Son Bui (my interview with him here) has organized a very interesting workshop (Constitutional Law of Greater China, 9-10 December 2021, Oxford Programme in Asian Laws) around essays that will be contributed to a Handbook of Constitutional Law in Greater China that is likely to become a standard in the field and an important reference for anyone interested in issues of Chinese constitutionalism (Program here). [read post]
8 Mar 2019, 10:46 am by David Greene
This history also attains greater relevance in light of Justice Thomas’s recent troubling call for the U.S. [read post]
30 Jan 2012, 7:53 am by Tom Goldstein
  They concluded that long-term monitoring violated the defendant’s reasonable expectation of privacy, without regard to the precise technology installed or used by the government. [read post]
3 Oct 2024, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
If a particular individual voter announced that she was not going to consider any long-term incumbents for re-election—not that past officeholding would be one Grutter-like factor in her interpersonal comparison of candidates, but that she would literally set aside long-term incumbents and not consider them—no one would suggest that she was impermissibly adding qualifications to the office. [read post]