Search for: "A. A. READ, Appeals Examiner"
Results 841 - 860
of 11,705
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Dec 2014, 1:21 pm
The suspension of a Board of Appeal member by EPO President, under the guise of a "house ban", reported here, has generated enormous disquiet, not only among bloggers, attorneys and EPO union officials, but now also within the Enlarged Board of Appeal.Merpel has been provided with a letter which is unprecedented in the 40 year history of the European Patent Organisation, which can be read here. [read post]
1 Aug 2014, 9:33 am
The appeals court first examined both primary and exclusive jurisdiction in Texas before dismissing the oil company’s claim that the arbitration panel should not have rendered the award. [read post]
10 Feb 2013, 3:12 pm
Shortly after the accident, the plaintiff underwent magnetic resonance imaging (hereinafter MRI) scans of the cervical and lumbar regions of his spine, which were read by the doctor, his examining radiologist. [read post]
21 Jan 2015, 9:58 am
" According to the Board, a POSITA informed by the specification "would not have viewed the claim as reading upon non-working embodiments. [read post]
8 Nov 2016, 8:11 am
In Support of Trademark Trial and Appeal Board Rulemaking: Replacing the Two-Month Time Period With A Sixty-Three Day Time PeriodAlexander Sofocleous When an appellant is dissatisfied with a decision by the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (“PTAB”) or Trademark Trial and Appeal Board (“TTAB”), the appellant may seek judicial review. [read post]
10 Nov 2014, 9:30 am
Commissioner of Correction (Habeas; "The petitioner, Richard Read, appeals from the judgment of the habeas court denying his petition for a writ of habeas corpus. [read post]
30 Aug 2021, 7:42 am
A Real-Life Appeal, Transcript, and Results – Ayo & Iken A successful appeal by our team member, Jason Coupal, Esquire Transcript Speaker 1: Good morning, the District Court of Appeal of the state of Florida and in for the second district is now in session. [read post]
21 Dec 2011, 5:01 pm
Sometimes Examining Divisions (ED) are too concise in their decisions refusing an application. [read post]
21 Mar 2023, 4:40 am
” Three laptops and three external hard drives were seized, and officers obtained new search warrants to examine those devices for evidence of the threats. [read post]
25 Jan 2024, 1:49 pm
On January 19, 2024, the Louisiana First Circuit Court of Appeal reinstated the Formosa Plastics (“FG LA”) facility air permits, which the lower court had previously vacated. [read post]
12 Dec 2018, 12:00 am
The appeal is admissible.Although in the statement of grounds of appeal the appellant does not specifically address the two-part form of claim 1 and the presence of reference signs, which were two of the three reasons for refusing the application, it is clear when reading claim 1 that these objections have been addressed.2. [read post]
1 Oct 2009, 12:02 pm
Respondent provided two independent medical examiners who ruled Petitioner not permanently disabled. [read post]
28 Aug 2018, 2:45 am
The applicant's appeal contests the examining division's decision dated 16 July 2012 refusing the European patent application no. 07 013 885.4.II. [read post]
25 Feb 2022, 11:48 am
Appeal An appeal takes the case off the Examiner’s desk and asks that a panel of administrative judges at the TTAB review it. [read post]
25 Feb 2022, 11:48 am
Appeal An appeal takes the case off the Examiner’s desk and asks that a panel of administrative judges at the TTAB review it. [read post]
17 May 2013, 1:25 pm
Read 13 remaining paragraphs | Comments [read post]
7 Jun 2017, 7:55 am
The criminal court of appeals affirmed the circuit court convictions. [read post]
27 Aug 2018, 11:30 pm
In this examination appeal, the Druckexemplar did not contain two of the four claim pages due to an error made by the Examining Division. [read post]
14 Aug 2024, 1:57 am
Legal remedies 7.1 Roman law An old roman principle reads: Nemo judex in sua causa[1] (None shall be a judge in their own cause). [read post]
4 Oct 2016, 7:09 am
The other party also needs to be notified of complaints about the work of the search and examining division, since the primary examiner forms part of the opposition division. [read post]
