Search for: "Akins v. State"
Results 841 - 860
of 3,090
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Oct 2018, 8:17 am
Did it merely eliminate state laws that either mandated or permitted school segregation? [read post]
15 Oct 2018, 11:35 am
It is akin to a trial. [read post]
11 Oct 2018, 5:28 am
In 1998, the Texas Supreme Court stated in Vail v. [read post]
9 Oct 2018, 7:28 am
The case is called, perhaps inevitably, Big Brother Watch and Others v. [read post]
5 Oct 2018, 1:30 pm
But this week, SCOTUS heard oral argument in Gundy v. [read post]
5 Oct 2018, 3:30 am
Mackintosh v. [read post]
30 Sep 2018, 8:32 pm
This includes a strong element of “minjok-jui” which literally means “racism,” but actually means something more akin to the Spanish “la raza,” or prideful recognition of a common ethnicity. [read post]
29 Sep 2018, 9:31 am
TCL v. [read post]
28 Sep 2018, 10:25 am
Golden v. [read post]
24 Sep 2018, 11:55 am
In August, the Eleventh Circuit decided Walker v. [read post]
23 Sep 2018, 4:03 pm
Steel Corp. v. [read post]
17 Sep 2018, 7:11 pm
The Court should have perhaps established a ‘litmus test’ setting out criteria to determine instances when one has been “prejudiced enough” something akin to the balancing test set out in the American case, Baker v Wingo[22]. [read post]
17 Sep 2018, 7:21 am
In Ridge Natural Resources v. [read post]
14 Sep 2018, 11:52 am
” Hutchinson v. [read post]
14 Sep 2018, 9:21 am
Haldeman v. [read post]
11 Sep 2018, 2:22 pm
And reviewed some of the -- get this -- over 250 published opinions in California state and federal court which mention that, yeah, it's definitely a derogatory term. [read post]
7 Sep 2018, 10:12 am
This very case helps show why the lesson of Cohen v. [read post]
7 Sep 2018, 8:14 am
Granting summary judgment to the church on the pastor’s breach of contract claim, the court further explained that parsing the precise reasons for his termination “is akin to determining whether a church’s religious-based reason for discharging a church leader is mere pretext, an inquiry the Supreme Court has explicitly forbidden by the First Amendment’s ministerial exception” (Lee v. [read post]
7 Sep 2018, 7:38 am
(Notably, the holding in Jiles was contradicted by the conclusion reached in a subsequent United States Supreme Court decision, Carpenter v. [read post]
