Search for: "American Federation of Government Employees v. United States"
Results 841 - 860
of 1,886
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Jul 2020, 9:00 pm
Although the United States suffered a long era in which the law made it difficult, if not impossible, to access contraception—a federal law passed in 1873 restricted the sale and circulation of contraception among other “obscene” things—that era more or less ended in 1965 when the Supreme Court ruled in Griswold v. [read post]
16 Jun 2013, 3:49 pm
United States v. [read post]
3 Dec 2018, 10:06 am
“The United States Government’s Role in the Asbestos Mess” (Jan. 31, 2012). [read post]
26 Nov 2018, 11:46 am
A selected Federal Government candidate will be assigned to the equivalent of Executive Schedule Level V. [read post]
23 May 2016, 6:27 am
Maybe the heat got to him: Hacker is now facing a criminal charge of using a deadly weapon in his encounter with the government employee. [read post]
8 Mar 2017, 8:51 pm
United States Supreme Court Indicates Possible Intention to Grant Certiorari in Magee v. [read post]
21 Feb 2014, 7:54 am
The United States did not fare well before the nation’s highest Court in its most recent case involving religious liberty. [read post]
13 Sep 2010, 7:24 am
American criminal law applies beyond the geographical confines of the United States, however, under certain limited circumstances. . . . [read post]
15 Dec 2009, 6:37 am
Carpenter may affect pending litigation in Pennsylvania state and federal courts (note: link will open in PDF format after download). [read post]
15 Jun 2011, 12:43 pm
Finally, the Court also issued its opinion in United States v. [read post]
24 Aug 2009, 5:46 pm
Modification of Retiree Benefits is Governed by 11 U.S.C. [read post]
13 May 2013, 6:48 pm
United Airlines v. [read post]
20 May 2024, 11:21 am
(Chamber of Commerce of the United States of America, et al. v. [read post]
28 Sep 2023, 7:44 am
United States v. [read post]
8 Dec 2022, 5:16 am
” In arguing that venue may not lie in D.C., Van Grack and Chervak rely on United States v. [read post]
4 Mar 2011, 9:11 am
United StatesDocket: 10-533Issue(s): Whether the Government must prove that a defendant had the specific intent to engage in a quid pro quo to convict him of bribery under 18 U.S.C. [read post]
13 Sep 2013, 1:31 pm
March 27, 2013) and American Express v. [read post]
21 Oct 2022, 6:13 am
From Weiss v. [read post]
7 Oct 2019, 7:17 pm
This is where a private party says the government made a mistake, and I, private party, I am going to sue the government in the United States district court. [read post]
28 Jan 2019, 2:26 pm
Upon completion, our fellows find fulfilling work at other think tanks, congressional committees, private-sector firms, advocacy organizations, and the federal government. [read post]
