Search for: "Barnes v. Washington"
Results 841 - 860
of 999
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Jul 2013, 5:00 am
Superior Court, 920 P.2d 1347, 1352-53 (Cal. 1996); Washington State Physicians Insurance Exchange & Ass’n v. [read post]
18 Jun 2009, 10:03 am
The ruling in District Attorney's Office v. [read post]
24 Apr 2013, 4:50 am
Animal Legal Defense Fund v. [read post]
29 Jun 2018, 4:17 am
Additional coverage comes from Ann Flaherty at the Associated Press, Robert Barnes for The Washington Post, Lyle Denniston at Constitution Daily, here and here, Amanda Reilly at E&E News, Ariel Wittenberg, also at E&E News, an NPR Politics podcast, Scott Bomboy at Constitution Daily, and David Lat at Above the Law. [read post]
16 Jul 2020, 2:30 pm
Washington Post Supreme Court correspondent Robert Barnes got that message, and led off his account of the decision with it:[Though] the rulings were a disappointment for those who hoped to see the president’s long-withheld financial records before November’s election, . . . the court’s more lasting message came in the first sentence of Trump v. [read post]
6 May 2010, 7:02 am
At the Washington Post, Michael Shear and Robert Barnes report on Kagan’s comments on Humanitarian Law Project v. [read post]
5 Apr 2012, 7:06 am
” Peter Wallsten and Robert Barnes of the Washington Post, Brooks Jackson of FactCheck.org (via USA Today), and Mike Sacks of the Huffington Post also have coverage of the President’s remarks, while Sandy Levinson has commentary at Balkinization. [read post]
17 Jun 2020, 3:58 am
” For The Washington Post (subscription required), Robert Barnes reports that “those who saw oral arguments in the cases now collectively known as Bostock v. [read post]
1 Jul 2010, 7:37 am
At the Washington Post, Courtland Milloy discusses Justice Thomas’ concurring opinion filed Monday in McDonald v. [read post]
2 Nov 2018, 10:48 am
See Hill v. [read post]
18 Mar 2011, 10:04 am
– Texarkana 1998) (noting that “[t]here is no requirement in a toxic tort case that a party must have reliable evidence of a relative risk of 2.0 or greater”) Asbestos Washington v. [read post]
5 Oct 2009, 6:11 am
Here’s Jess Bravin’s report on the Mass in the Wall Street Journal Washington Wire Blog. [read post]
13 Apr 2020, 3:46 am
” Additional coverage comes from Adam Liptak for The New York Times and Robert Barnes for The Washington Post (subscription required). [read post]
1 Nov 2021, 6:40 pm
Robert Barnes of The Washington Post reports that “Supreme Court seems willing to allow challenge of Texas’s restrictive abortion law. [read post]
3 May 2010, 6:35 am
Briefly: In the Washington Post, Robert Barnes explores the political terrain surrounding the Court, in which all sides seem to agree that “judicial activism” is undesirable, even though it is sometimes the Court’s responsibility to strike down laws. [read post]
30 Apr 2020, 4:22 am
” At The Washington Post (subscription required), Robert Barnes reports that “[a]t the Justice Department, whose attorneys will take part in nine of the 10 scheduled arguments, the pleas will be made to a speakerphone in the solicitor general’s conference room,” and the advocates “will still be wearing morning coats, the formal, traditional dress for government lawyers who argue before the court. [read post]
1 Apr 2019, 3:54 am
” Robert Barnes reports for The Washington Post that “[t]t’s difficult to say with certainty why” the court reached different results in the two cases, but “the obvious place to start is new Justice Brett M. [read post]
14 Sep 2016, 5:56 am
At the Notice and Comment blog, David Feder discusses Esquivel-Quintana v. [read post]
30 Jan 2017, 4:11 am
” In The Washington Post, Robert Barnes reports that “those who know Gorsuch and have studied his decade of solidly conservative opinions on the U.S. [read post]
24 Feb 2011, 6:27 am
McIntyre Machinery v. [read post]
