Search for: "Brooks v. Brooks" Results 841 - 860 of 2,702
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Mar 2008, 7:04 am
The ruling came in the case of Snyder v. [read post]
30 Jan 2012, 7:32 am
Category: Recent Decisions;Workers’ Compensation Opinions Body: Below is today's workers' compensation Appellate Court opinion:AC32632 - Brooks v. [read post]
5 Jan 2011, 9:22 pm by Simon Gibbs
Perhaps Lord Justice Brooke's comments in Black v Pastouna & Pastouna [2005] EWCA Civ 1389 will be given appropriate weight: "I would add that it is incumbent on those advising parties appearing before this, or any, court to take all the steps they can in accordance with CPR Rules 1.1 and 1.3 to reduce the cost of the proceedings. [read post]
9 Oct 2010, 10:20 pm by Ted Frank
[NYT] "Dodd-Frank reform law invites new litigation opportunities against mortgage lenders," overturns Watters v. [read post]
16 May 2008, 7:49 am
Double amputee Oscar Pistorius of South Africa can compete in the Olympics with prosthetic legs, according to the Court of Arbitration for Sport (ABAJournal and JammieWearingFool, with video);New York lawyers sue attorney general over pension probe (Adjunct Law Professor Blog);A study debunks the medical malpractice crisis (Ambrogi @ Legal Blog Watch);Lawyers average salaries place them on 17th on list (Elefant @ Legal Blog Watch;The whistle gets blown at Blawg Review #159;Brooks Schuelke… [read post]
21 Sep 2016, 2:00 am by Cyrus Farivar
Enlarge (credit: Andrew Brookes / Getty Images News) A federal judge in Iowa has ordered the suppression of child pornography evidence derived from an invalid warrant. [read post]
12 Oct 2010, 7:00 am by Timothy Sandefur, guest-blogging
Probably the most famous case about this issue is Nebbia v. [read post]
26 Aug 2022, 7:23 am by Eric Goldman
Ancestry Court Casts Doubt on the Legality of the Data Brokerage Industry–Brooks v. [read post]
5 May 2009, 8:34 am
The Court relied upon the pre 1980 economic literature to conclude that "there is a consensus that predatory pricing schemes are rarely tried, and even more rarely successful" (Brooke Group v. [read post]