Search for: "Christopher v. United States"
Results 841 - 860
of 1,667
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Dec 2014, 8:19 am
Supreme Court twice in 1888, first with The Telephone Cases (126 U.S. 1), and then with United States v. [read post]
22 Dec 2014, 9:43 am
Michelle V. [read post]
15 Dec 2014, 7:25 am
The addressee is Christoph Ernst, head of Germany's delegation to the EPO's Administrative Council.* Leading European IP Judges join the chorus of condemnationMerpel reports that a further letter has been sent to the AC by two highly respected IP judges from the UK and the Netherlands. [read post]
11 Dec 2014, 8:52 am
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit in United States v. [read post]
3 Dec 2014, 6:52 am
United States v. [read post]
28 Nov 2014, 9:56 am
FinnCase number: 13-cv-02280 (United States District Court for the District of Nevada)Case filed: December 16, 2013Qualifying Judgment/Order: September 15, 2014 11/26/2014 02/24/2015 2014-128 SEC v. [read post]
District Court Rules FEC Regulation Limiting Disclosure “Arbitrary, Capricious, and Contrary to Law”
26 Nov 2014, 6:37 am
In Christopher Van Hollen v. [read post]
25 Nov 2014, 9:00 am
Christopher H. [read post]
23 Nov 2014, 12:30 am
Whereas his previous work did an admi- rable job of depicting how the historical trans- formation of ownership in the United States was aided by the process of measuring and recording, he has expanded his range here into a somewhat unmanageable though always interesting tract. [read post]
7 Nov 2014, 11:54 am
Christopher Soghoian, the ACLU technologist who revealed the deception initially, took to Twitter to announce his outrage at the irresponsibility of impersonating a media entity. [read post]
7 Nov 2014, 5:52 am
By our count, federal judges have trampled over state sovereignty with respect to the heeding presumption in no fewer than eleven states – Alaska, Colorado (despite contrary state-court authority), Georgia, Hawaii, Illinois, Iowa, Kentucky, Maine, New York (despite contrary state-court authority), South Dakota, and Wyoming.Finally, because various states have taken quite different approaches to whether a heeding presumption exists at all and… [read post]
3 Nov 2014, 3:05 am
; * A clear vision of genuine use: Specsavers v Asda (again); * Chemists and mech/elecs unite! [read post]
27 Oct 2014, 7:00 am
Weaver, Jr., Christopher C. [read post]
22 Oct 2014, 8:23 am
We can look to United States courts and how they approach issues like this. [read post]
19 Oct 2014, 8:30 am
Regan v. [read post]
18 Oct 2014, 12:22 pm
United States v. [read post]
15 Oct 2014, 10:18 am
Impact on Capital Punishment in the United States At the time of the decision, Texas had 29 minors awaiting the death penalty who were instead given life sentences. [read post]
15 Oct 2014, 10:18 am
Impact on Capital Punishment in the United States At the time of the decision, Texas had 29 minors awaiting the death penalty who were instead given life sentences. [read post]
13 Oct 2014, 2:03 pm
’s explanation for the coding of Wisconsin v. [read post]
4 Oct 2014, 12:09 pm
That goal ultimately came to have bipartisan support in the United States, largely as a result of Selikoff’s advocacy. [read post]
