Search for: "Cox v. State"
Results 841 - 860
of 1,040
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Jul 2007, 3:11 am
Ed. 1031 (1942); see also Cox v. [read post]
5 Sep 2011, 5:16 am
Cox and Thomas Lee Hazen. [read post]
2 Dec 2008, 3:57 pm
Including the Forgery and Counterfeiting Act 1981 under which one of the most famous hacking cases was considered, R v Gold (1988) 2 WLR 984. [read post]
21 Apr 2009, 12:17 pm
In US v. [read post]
13 Feb 2009, 7:03 am
Ltd v Parle Agro Pvt. [read post]
1 Dec 2020, 6:45 pm
Fund v. [read post]
22 Feb 2017, 9:06 am
The cohort was followed for a median of 6.6 years, in which time there were 154 cases of ovarian cancer, available for analysis using Cox’s proportional hazards model. [read post]
7 Jan 2011, 5:39 pm
People v. [read post]
5 Mar 2013, 1:56 am
Chief Executive Officer Paul V. [read post]
1 Apr 2016, 10:29 am
July 25, 2013) (GMO food case), Cox v. [read post]
9 Feb 2012, 12:52 pm
Cox, Cox, Horning & McGrath, LLC, Gillette, Wyoming.Representing Appellee (Defendants): Catherine M. [read post]
30 Oct 2014, 12:02 pm
Cox case has been understood to prevent state and local redistricting plans with deviations from strict population equality done for bad reasons, such as to help one’s political party. [read post]
8 May 2014, 5:00 am
June 13, 2000); Cox v. [read post]
23 Jul 2017, 4:08 pm
United States Actor James Woods has settled a defamation claim over a Tweet calling him a “cocaine addict”. [read post]
27 Jun 2017, 4:22 am
In Pavan v. [read post]
3 Feb 2008, 10:42 pm
Additionally, if the proposal was included in the proxy statement, the board would have had an opportunity to state its reasons for opposition. [read post]
28 Jun 2009, 9:52 pm
In a recent case this month, Barnes v Yahoo! [read post]
4 Jan 2018, 10:59 am
v. [read post]
18 Aug 2009, 6:18 am
The Submitting Professors are affiliated with forty-seven universities around the United States. [read post]
10 Apr 2019, 4:52 pm
In finding for the Claimant, Mitting J stated “…The impression given by the postings to the ordinary reader was a significant and distorting overstatement of what had in fact occurred. [read post]
