Search for: "Does 1-27" Results 841 - 860 of 12,431
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Feb 2016, 8:31 am by David M. Goldman
Using a Form 1 does not involve manufacturing under a license, but does involve making or manufacturing by one without a license to manufacture. [read post]
21 Apr 2016, 4:42 pm by Andrew Delaney
Rosenfield, 2016 VT 27By Elizabeth KruskaThis is a case that appears to boil down to someone doing something in the wrong order and what the right response ought to be.Michael Rosenfield was convicted of a DUI 1 when he was 18, a DUI 2 when he was 21, and a DUI 3 when he was 27. [read post]
3 Apr 2020, 2:08 am
 The DOL’s Rules issued on April 1, 2020 restates and reinforces this position.[6]  The DOL appears to be reading the phrase “under 18 years of age” out of the EFMLEA, as if it does not exist. [read post]
13 Nov 2023, 1:28 am by Rose Hughes
However, the EPO applies the same gold standard to disclaimers as it does to any other type of feature. [read post]
The Pregnant Workers Fairness Act does not go into effect until April 1, 2018; at which time Massachusetts employers will be required to provide written notice to employees of their rights under the Act. [read post]
9 Jul 2008, 9:31 am
  Based on a summary of the bill, the DOE would receive approximately $27 billion in funding, which is slightly more than $1 billion over the President’s budget. [read post]
31 Jan 2024, 2:03 pm by Carl Shusterman
Garland – 5th Circuit Court of Appeal (9-27-21) Kahumbu v. [read post]
  Also posted on HIPAA, HITECH & HIT HIPAA does not protect animals’ health information – it applies to the protected health information (or PHI) of an “individual”, defined as “the person who is the subject of” the PHI. [read post]
26 Sep 2008, 4:03 pm
Pursuing the matter on an individual basis is neither cost-effective nor does it garner the same attention from your ex-employer as a $600-million lawsuit on behalf of 10,000 employees would, such as the suit the CIBC currently faces for unpaid overtime. [read post]
7 Jun 2022, 2:08 am by Hayleigh Bosher
”However, the complaint does states that the “Defendants, have knowingly, willfully, and intentionally engaged in a campaign to infringe Plaintiff’s copyright in the work “All I Want for Christmas is You,” and points to violation of Section 106 (1)-(3) and (5) of 17 U.S.C. [read post]