Search for: "Duncan v. Duncan"
Results 841 - 860
of 958
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Jul 2019, 4:23 pm
However, MPS Deputy Assistant Commissioner Duncan Ball said the force was “extremely disappointed with the negative and unbalanced tone” of the report, insisting the pilot had been successful. [read post]
31 May 2020, 4:22 pm
Canada On 25 May 2020, default judgment was given in the defamation case of Duncan v. [read post]
25 Nov 2010, 4:08 pm
In X & Y v Persons Unknown ([2007] 1 FLR 1567 at [42]-[49]). [read post]
24 Nov 2020, 12:02 pm
Duncan, 369 S.W.2d 917, 922 (Tex. 1963). [read post]
13 Feb 2012, 11:05 am
(Carcieri v. [read post]
9 Aug 2008, 1:50 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Thinktank Global week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included: The end of William Patry’s blog: (Patry Copyright Blog), (Excess Copyright), (Patently-O), (Chicago IP Litigation Blog), (Michael Geist), (The Fire of Genius), (Techdirt), (Patry Copyright Blog), Kitchin J clarifies scope of biotech patents, in particular gene sequence patents: Eli Lilly & Co v Human Genome Sciences:… [read post]
21 Sep 2007, 11:50 pm
Sims v. [read post]
25 Dec 2007, 10:32 am
Stewart v. [read post]
22 Dec 2010, 5:28 am
On Twitter, Duncan Bannatyne became involved in a spat with legal journalist Darren Newman on the effect the Equality Act would have in the workplace. [read post]
10 Jul 2024, 7:32 am
Here’s what you can expect from the Court’s next crop of cases.R. v. [read post]
11 Feb 2019, 7:54 am
Rachins v. [read post]
10 Jul 2024, 7:32 am
Here’s what you can expect from the Court’s next crop of cases.R. v. [read post]
2 Jun 2010, 6:55 am
The ruling in Carr v. [read post]
24 Oct 2008, 3:19 pm
People v. [read post]
23 May 2015, 9:00 pm
., Petitioner, v. [read post]
17 Feb 2013, 9:03 pm
Arguing in McBurney v. [read post]
22 Feb 2017, 9:06 am
Hamilton v. [read post]
16 Jan 2024, 6:00 am
For instance, in the “New York v. [read post]
26 Jan 2023, 6:36 am
Duncan, 2023-NCCOA-5, ___ N.C. [read post]
17 Jul 2010, 2:11 am
The view of the learned editors of Duncan & Neill (Duncan and Neil on Defamation (Butterworths, 3rd edition, 2009), at 17.26. is that it can but the better view, which was assumed to be the case by at least two of their lordships in Reynolds (at 201 and 193-5 per Lord Nicholls and 237-8 per Lord Hobhouse.) is that it cannot. [read post]
