Search for: "Federal Public Defender Office of New Jersey"
Results 841 - 860
of 1,006
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Jan 2016, 5:33 am
In 1938 Congress passed the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (FDCA) in reaction to growing public food safety demands. [read post]
10 Apr 2007, 1:30 am
A New Jersey lawyer: Given the gross miscarriage of justice perpetrated against the three Defendants in the Duke Lacrosse incident, I am amazed at the venom that continues to be spewed against them. [read post]
26 Jul 2010, 9:08 am
Announces Settlement of Actions to Enforce Payment Obligations for Cleanup of New Jersey Superfund Site. [read post]
22 Nov 2016, 4:30 am
Just in September, a man inspired by a variety of jihadist groups detonated bombs in New York and New Jersey. [read post]
3 Feb 2011, 2:00 pm
Employees who were laid off have sued, arguing the company broke federal laws ? [read post]
21 Oct 2009, 2:00 am
Order That Defendant Foot Class-Notification Bill
New Jersey Law Journal
Three U.S. [read post]
9 Aug 2008, 1:50 am
Here is IP Think Tank’s weekly selection of top intellectual property news breaking in the blogosphere and internet. [read post]
21 Jun 2020, 7:01 am
Inspired by Breivik’s twin 2011 attacks on the Norwegian prime minister’s office in Oslo and a youth camp on the island of Utøya in order to publicize his 1,500-page manifesto, Tarrant, for instance, took full advantage of modern communications technologies both before and during his own twin attacks in New Zealand. [read post]
24 Sep 2011, 3:58 am
The bankruptcy court held that the discovery documents at issue could be disclosed to the public, because the public's interest in disclosure of these discovery documents outweighed the priests' privacy interest under Rule 26(c) and that the documents filed in court could be disclosed because they did not contain "scandalous" allegations for purposes of 11 U.S.C. 107(b). [read post]
30 May 2008, 9:09 am
Here is IP Think Tank’s weekly selection of top intellectual property news breaking in the blogosphere and internet. [read post]
7 Jun 2010, 9:54 am
Both defendants reside in Hartsel, Colo. [read post]
7 Jun 2010, 10:04 am
Both defendants reside in Hartsel, Colo. [read post]
21 Nov 2008, 1:36 pm
Here is IP Think Tank’s weekly selection of top intellectual property news breaking in the blogosphere and internet. [read post]
22 Nov 2011, 12:59 pm
I will contrast the New Jersey court’s approach with that of California—where the legislature has enacted a new statute focused exclusively on online e-personation. [read post]
10 Jul 2014, 9:54 am
CBT New Jersey Appeals Court Reverses Anti-Harassment Order Based on Emails – E.L. v. [read post]
18 Dec 2019, 10:03 am
The States of California, Colorado, Connecticut, Delaware, Florida, Georgia, Hawaii, Illinois, Indiana, Iowa, Louisiana, Maryland, Massachusetts, Michigan, Minnesota, Montana, Nevada, New Jersey, New Mexico, New York, North Carolina, Oklahoma, Rhode Island, Tennessee, Texas, Vermont, Virginia, Washington, Wisconsin, and the District Of Columbia are joining the DOJ in the complaint as co-plaintiffs. [read post]
4 Feb 2009, 12:20 am
The Supreme Court of Florida ordered a public reprimand for St. [read post]
17 Oct 2013, 10:32 am
Copus, recently retired from Ogletree Deakins in Morristown, New Jersey, explained that the Ledbetter decision contained the following two parts: Title VII claimants must challenge specific pay decisions; and The aggrieved employee must file a charge within 180/300 days of the allegedly discriminatory pay decision. [read post]
2 Jun 2020, 10:35 am
Federal and State Prosecutions against Physicians and Screening Companies After Judge Jack’s exposé of fraudulent and false diagnoses in the silicosis MDL, various news media reported that the United States Attorney’s office in the Southern District of New York was investigating possible criminal charges against the physicians and lawyers who orchestrated the screenings. [read post]
10 Mar 2010, 12:29 am
High Court Weighs Title Insurer's Liability for Attorney's Theft of Client Funds New Jersey Law Journal The New Jersey Supreme Court is deciding if a title insurer can be held liable for a lawyer's theft of a home buyer's funds if it fails to tell the buyer directly it is not responsible for the lawyer's misdeeds. [read post]
