Search for: "German v. State"
Results 841 - 860
of 3,581
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Jun 2011, 9:35 am
This is also apparent from Article 7, which states that the Directive shall not affect the right of member states “to apply or introduce laws, regulations or administrative provisions which are more favourable to employees. [read post]
23 Oct 2018, 10:51 am
So, an alcoholic drink and an energy drink are not similar merely because they can be mixed, consumed or marketed together, given that the nature, intended purpose, and use of those goods differ, based on the presence - or absence - of alcohol in their composition.The Court recognised that the German, and thereby the Austrian, public is used to and aware of the distinction between alcoholic and non-alcoholic drinks and would make that distinction when comparing the Red Bull and Asolo… [read post]
4 Mar 2013, 7:34 pm
In Kuxhausen v. [read post]
13 Mar 2013, 7:55 pm
In Kuxhausen v. [read post]
29 Nov 2007, 2:21 am
Lindor's legal defense in UMG v. [read post]
12 Mar 2009, 2:12 pm
United States, 422 F.2d 874, 878 (Ct. [read post]
4 Jan 2018, 4:03 am
The Court also stated that features that have been modified by FN Herstal to provide them with additional technical functions cannot be considered “copied” either, and in any event not “slavishly”. [read post]
19 Oct 2010, 4:26 am
Under South Dakota v. [read post]
15 May 2014, 11:49 pm
The judge in Gardener v. [read post]
22 Dec 2011, 7:27 am
The third issue of 2011 of the Dutch journal on Private International Law, Nederlands Internationaal Privaatrecht includes the following contributions on the Brussels I Recast (lis pendens and choice of court), Voluntary Assignment, and case notes on TNT Express v. [read post]
9 Aug 2011, 10:06 am
In Morrison v. [read post]
2 Jul 2017, 2:23 am
The Court stated that the operators of said platform, playing an essential role in making the works available, are to be considered liable of copyright infringement. [read post]
11 Oct 2018, 5:08 am
The Munich I Regional Court ("Landgericht München I" in German) just announced the first final judgment on a Qualcomm v. [read post]
19 Mar 2015, 10:49 am
Last week Advocate General Mengozzi gave his Opinion in Case C-20/14 BGW Marketing - & Management- Service GmbH v Bodo Scholz [available so far in 17 EU official languages, but not English, notes Merpel] on the interpretation of Article 4(1)(b) of Directive 2008/95, following a request by the Bundespatentgericht (German Federal Patent Court) to the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) for a preliminary ruling.The underlying dispute… [read post]
1 Jul 2017, 12:00 am
The Court stated that the operators of said platform, playing an essential role in making the works available, are to be considered liable of copyright infringement. [read post]
23 Feb 2011, 6:00 am
In the oft quoted words of Willes J in East v Holmes ((1858) 1 F&F 347, 349), “If a man wrote that all lawyers were thieves, no particular lawyer could sue him unless there was something to point to the particular individual“ In the leading English case of Knupffer v Express Newspapers ([1944] AC 116) the “Daily Express” published an article referring to “The quislings on whom Hitler flatters himself he can build a pro-German… [read post]
18 Sep 2013, 7:28 am
John adds that Mr Brandis has stated that the new Government will wait until the post-implementation review of the ARR scheme is complete before it does anything. [read post]
25 Sep 2018, 6:35 am
The German defendant’s contacts with the United States stemmed from its Internet presence. [read post]
14 Dec 2013, 7:00 am
Oral arguments in Hatim v. [read post]
8 Jun 2011, 4:30 am
Quinonez v. [read post]
