Search for: "Hastings v. State"
Results 841 - 860
of 907
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Dec 2019, 9:05 pm
FTC v. [read post]
16 Jul 2013, 9:00 pm
Suddenly, in the government’s haste to defend the NSA program, all the talk of a safer world and a pre-9/11 perspective was chased off the public square. [read post]
14 Sep 2020, 9:01 pm
Above all that, it was clearly wrongly decided, and illustrates how some judges have bad interpretive instincts when it comes to navigating the tricky but ultra-important voting rights realm.The case, Texas Democratic Party v. [read post]
29 Mar 2011, 3:24 am
It is true that the placing of data on a server in one state can make the data available to the public of another state but that does not mean that the party who has made the data available has committed the act of making available by transmission in the State of reception. [read post]
14 Jul 2024, 9:01 pm
As described by the Delaware Supreme Court in its Dieckman v. [read post]
10 Apr 2023, 9:00 pm
If we were to view it this way, the law would survive, according to cases such as Ward v. [read post]
21 Dec 2009, 3:06 am
Miller (Lewis and Clark), Judith V. [read post]
15 Apr 2021, 9:01 pm
A few weeks back, in Meriwether v. [read post]
24 Jan 2023, 4:37 am
” We have to assume that this wheeze was dreamed up in some haste, meeting the immediate political imperative to respond to a strongly supported back bench amendment that tried to tack videos of boat crossings on to the Bill’s children’s duties. [read post]
9 Mar 2025, 9:01 pm
The Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution, arguably the most important piece of law enacted anywhere in the world over the last two centuries, opens majestically with these words: “All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the state wherein they reside. [read post]
2 Oct 2024, 6:26 am
In effect, it is a descriptive survey comprised of five sections: (i) the operation of the Act; (ii) current issues in defamation law; (iii) stakeholder opinions; (iv) developments in NI and elsewhere; and (v) conclusions and recommendations. [read post]
8 Jul 2014, 4:20 am
In American Pipe & Construction Co. v. [read post]
19 Jan 2023, 12:49 pm
According to the solicitor general of the U.S. in Goldman Sachs Group Inc. v. [read post]
29 May 2023, 9:01 pm
As Justice Alito’s 2017 majority opinion in Matal v. [read post]
1 May 2024, 9:01 pm
But students and faculty have no special or greater entitlement to protest state action or institutional decisions than anyone else in this country. [read post]
7 Sep 2010, 9:24 am
Click Here DECISIONS Arkema, Inc. v. [read post]
1 Jun 2011, 7:21 am
Costs v. [read post]
20 Nov 2007, 8:55 am
DPPA was initially introduced in the House of Representatives on March 30, 2006 and would amend title 17, section 2 of the United States Code, by expanding the term, "design," to include "fashion design" and affording protection to fashion designs.[9] An identical bill was also introduced in the Senate on August 2, 2007.[10] DPPA would essentially extend protection to the appearance as a whole of an article of apparel, including its ornamentation, with apparel defined to… [read post]
3 May 2023, 9:03 pm
[vi]The release does not offer any substantive explanation for why such haste is necessary. [read post]
10 May 2010, 11:30 pm
Richard Fentiman is Reader in Private International Law at the University of Cambridge, where he teaches the postgraduate course on International Commercial Litigation. [read post]
