Search for: "In Re Crawford" Results 841 - 860 of 908
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Nov 2020, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
National/Federal A Government Watchdog Says White House Chief of Staff Mark Meadows Spent Campaign Funds on Personal Expenditures Business Insider – Yelena Dzhanova | Published: 10/31/2020 Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington (CREW) is calling for an investigation into White House Chief of Staff Mark Meadows after accusing him of misusing thousands of dollars in campaign funds. [read post]
18 Sep 2010, 9:49 am by Marta Requejo
Many thanks to professor Kenneth Anderson for authorizing this post, meant as a suite of Trey’s. [read post]
13 Apr 2022, 6:23 am by Ryan Goodman
The Biden administration is reportedly considering shifting its position on the International Criminal Court (ICC) by providing support to the Prosecutor’s investigation of Russian war crimes in Ukraine. [read post]
10 Jun 2008, 2:36 pm
Cepeda-Rios, No. 07-50731 An imposition of an eight level sentence enhancement for a guilty plea conviction for illegal re-entry is affirmed where: 1) the enhancement applied because defendant's second conviction for possession of narcotics would have been a felony if prosecuted under the Controlled Substances Act; and 2) defendant's second state conviction for possession had to be treated as an aggravated felony for purposes of his sentence. [read post]
6 Mar 2015, 12:53 pm by MOTP
ARBITRABILITY OF HEALTH CARE LIABILITY CLAIMS IN TEXAS: FAA PREEMPTION AND MFA REVERSE PREEMPTION IN THE MED-MAL CONTEXT In an opinion released today, the Texas Supreme Court holds that the federal law that accords states the right to regulate the business of insurance (McCarran-Ferguson Act) does not furnish an exception to the general principle that the FAA (Federal Arbitration Act) preempts the TAA (Texas Arbitration Act) and other state arbitration laws when the two conflict, where the… [read post]
22 Sep 2013, 8:35 am by Susan Schneider
., and work as a licensed realtor for Re/MAX One in New MexicoVena A-dae RomeroExecutive Director, Cochiti Youth ExperiencePro Tem Judge, Karuk Tribe of CaliforniaJ.D., Arizona State University College of Law            Arizona State [read post]
12 Oct 2011, 4:59 am by Rob Robinson
http://bit.ly/q1UD5l (Fulbright) Socially Aware: The Social Media Law Update (PDF) http://bit.ly/mQIDCt (Morrison & Foerster) Six Provocations for Big Data – http://bit.ly/nZh1pb (Danah Boyd, Kate Crawford) The History of Digital #Storage [INFOGRAPHIC] http://on.mash.to/purTmv (Matt Silverman) The Sequence and Chronology of Meet and Confer – http://bit.ly/p2OPlS (Orange Legal Technologies) Tracking the Trackers: Where Everybody Knows Your Username –… [read post]
19 Oct 2011, 4:40 am by Rob Robinson
http://bit.ly/q1UD5l (Fulbright) Socially Aware: The Social Media Law Update (PDF) http://bit.ly/mQIDCt (Morrison & Foerster) Six Provocations for Big Data – http://bit.ly/nZh1pb (Danah Boyd, Kate Crawford) The History of Digital #Storage [INFOGRAPHIC] http://on.mash.to/purTmv (Matt Silverman) The Sequence and Chronology of Meet and Confer – http://bit.ly/p2OPlS (Orange Legal Technologies) Tracking the Trackers: Where Everybody Knows Your Username –… [read post]
15 Feb 2015, 9:48 am by Andrew Frisch
Because at-issue waiver is to be “decided by the courts on a case-by-case basis, and depends primarily on the specific context in which the privilege is asserted,” In re Grand Jury Proceedings, 219 F.3d at 183, the Court will examine the specific factual context of this case. [read post]
2 Nov 2010, 3:26 pm by Aaron
The Court also concluded that the admission of out-of-court hearsay statements at the pretrial CrR 3.6 hearing did not violate Crawford. http://www.courts.wa.gov/opinions/pdf/62679-5.pub.doc.pdf State v. [read post]
28 Jan 2013, 11:46 am by Schachtman
Armstrong Rubber Co., 406 F.2d 1315, 1318 (3d Cir. 1969) (holding that defendant cannot be found liable on the basis that it supplied 75-80% of the kind of tire purchased by the plaintiff; any verdict based on this evidence “would at best be a guess”) Crawford v. [read post]