Search for: "In Re Doe" Results 841 - 860 of 94,234
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Oct 2007, 6:27 am
 According to Judge Senter, the answer is no, although of course actual acceptance of the flood money means at least that amount cannot be re-compensated as wind damage. [read post]
24 May 2011, 6:00 am by Bill Raftery
Many if not most states have some sort of revolving fund(s) for courts that does not require re-appropriation each year but may be used by the courts for general operations or some specific purpose. [read post]
15 Oct 2013, 4:22 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
As such, we do notsustain the rejection of claim 5.In re Bond is cited:Such adistinction does not persuasively demonstrate the finding is in error becausethe nomenclature is not controlling. [read post]
25 Nov 2022, 5:47 am by Mark Keenan
If this scenario sounds like what you’re facing, read our article on getting divorced without an address for your spouse. [read post]
14 Nov 2018, 5:49 am by Rick Davis & Associates
While the court can hold a second trial if the first trial results in a mistrial, the state cannot re-try a defendant who has been acquitted during a trial on the charges for which he or she was acquitted. [read post]
15 Apr 2007, 12:35 pm
However, it does not get into the "presumption of enablement" and "In re Best" issues which are significant in these particular re-examinations. [read post]
29 Nov 2017, 6:21 am by Robert Kraft
  If you’re on Medicare, you have a card that has your Social Security on it, followed by a letter. [read post]
23 Sep 2013, 9:22 am
Career clerks do not disperse into the world to spread the good word about the good work the court does. [read post]
2 Jun 2024, 5:11 am
I'm rephrasing the question to assist liberals — "liberals" — whose hearts might inappropriately lift when they see the headline "If Trump Is Guilty, Does It Matter If the Prosecution Was Political? [read post]
6 Dec 2022, 2:30 pm by John R. Byrne
" It's hard to do justice to the reasoning of both sides, so the opinion is worth a read, if anything to re-familiarize yourself with the various canons of statutory construction, which get a lot of attention (even the "absurdity canon")! [read post]