Search for: "In re Lawrence"
Results 841 - 860
of 2,471
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Apr 2015, 8:51 pm
See Lawrence v. [read post]
28 Apr 2015, 4:17 pm
“Well, we’re ready,” Roberts replies. [read post]
27 Apr 2015, 1:12 am
JR 38, Re Judicial Review, heard 6 November 2014. [read post]
21 Apr 2015, 7:26 am
This will not be news to those who have been following Lawrence Lessig in recent years, but the matter-of-fact tone of these emails is still revealing. [read post]
18 Apr 2015, 6:32 am
Baldwin had seen the movie, and he said: "There wasn't any sense, to me, of: What are the people who are in Scientology, who remain in Scientology, who are dedicated to this, what do they perceive they're getting out of it?... [read post]
17 Apr 2015, 9:30 am
JR 38, Re Judicial Review, heard 6 November 2014. [read post]
14 Apr 2015, 1:05 am
His academic achievements so far are swaying him towards the Chancery, however being of a military background, he has not ruled out re-enlisting as a Legal Officer. [read post]
12 Apr 2015, 10:54 am
The more pertinent number, however, is the success rate of incumbent prosecutors in elections when they seek re-election. [read post]
10 Apr 2015, 8:13 am
JR 38, Re Judicial Review, heard 6 November 2014. [read post]
8 Apr 2015, 3:36 am
” At PrawfsBlawg, Richard Re looks at a proposal by retired Justice John Paul Stevens for a constitutional amendment addressing state sovereign immunity; Re contends that “thereis something quite surprising about Stevens’s proposal: if read according to its terms, it might not have any significant effect at all. [read post]
7 Apr 2015, 7:49 am
If you’re a third party organizer – and not the beneficiary – you’ll want to consider language that makes it clear that you’re merely acting as a conduit. [read post]
5 Apr 2015, 7:50 pm
Wong, Lawrence O. [read post]
2 Apr 2015, 10:23 am
We’re all going to miss Shari. [read post]
31 Mar 2015, 11:18 pm
The courts of Illinois have issued a ruling contrary to ECUSA's position, and that decision is now final, or what attorneys call res judicata ["the matter has been adjudged"]. [read post]
31 Mar 2015, 3:06 am
At PrawfsBlawg, Richard Re looks at whether “a distinctively anti-agency mood has taken hold at the Supreme Court. [read post]
27 Mar 2015, 12:45 am
Also what assailed me in ‘Smiths’ Lewisham was an old book by Peter Hitchens currently being re-marketed about Winston Churchill and the loss of British greatness, which seems to merge two parts Farrage with one part Al Murray. [read post]
23 Mar 2015, 2:10 am
JR 38, Re Judicial Review, heard 6 November 2014. [read post]
22 Mar 2015, 12:30 am
Along the way, activists re-wrote party voting procedures that reinforced the power of vocal minorities within each party, thereby entrenching political polarization for the decades to come. [read post]
21 Mar 2015, 5:08 am
Lawrence S. [read post]
18 Mar 2015, 9:30 am
(I know; you’re tearing up along with me.) [read post]
