Search for: "JUSTICES OF THE CALIFORNIA SUPREME COURT, Former"
Results 841 - 860
of 3,234
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Oct 2018, 9:01 pm
Supreme Court has in recent decades frowned on racial floors or quotas under so-called strict scrutiny, in cases such as Regents of the University of California v. [read post]
28 Apr 2016, 6:15 am
Sheehan Buys Ads to Promote His Ethics Bill” by Katherine Gregg for Providence Journal Virgina: “McDonnell Trial: Supreme Court justices express skepticism of former Virginia governor’s conviction” by Robert Barnes and Laura Vozzella for Washington Post Elections “Is the U.S. [read post]
18 Dec 2018, 12:01 am
In 1982, law professor Peter Irons found that the Justice Department had withheld or destroyed evidence before the Korematsu case reached the Supreme Court. [read post]
26 May 2009, 1:53 pm
Supreme Court case that decided the presidential election, and by David Boies, who represented former Vice President Al Gore in the same case.The case is Perry et al v. [read post]
22 Jun 2015, 5:49 am
" [New York Times] * The Supreme Court is currently considering an emergency appeal out of Texas after the Fifth Circuit refused to stay a decision that would all but close the vast majority of abortion facilities in the state. [read post]
19 Jan 2011, 12:31 pm
Eight Justices joined in upholding that outcome; Justice Elena Kagan, who had filed the appeal for NASA in her former role as U.S. [read post]
22 Dec 2016, 11:03 am
(By then, Wendy was a Georgetown law professor and RBG a Supreme Court justice.) [read post]
9 Jan 2019, 1:54 pm
The issue for the Supreme Court this time around is a question on which the court deadlocked in 2016, after Justice Antonin Scalia’s death: Whether Nevada v. [read post]
6 Oct 2009, 3:40 pm
The Supreme Court will hear argument at 10 a.m. [read post]
19 Oct 2023, 6:57 am
” “In August the California Supreme Court began requiring lawyers to report fraud, misappropriation of funds and other criminal acts or conduct that raise ‘a substantial question’ about another lawyer’s ‘honesty, trustworthiness, or fitness as a lawyer.'” [read post]
23 Mar 2022, 5:30 am
If Justice Jackson were to continue serving on the Harvard Board into her time on the Supreme Court, that would create the appearance, not the reality, of a conflict of interest, but that appearance would be enough to warrant recusal. [read post]
26 Jul 2014, 6:57 am
It could ask next for a "petition for rehearing" by the full appellate court, or it could file a petition for leave to appeal the decision to the Illinois Supreme Court (of which only about 4-5% are granted). [read post]
26 Mar 2015, 9:01 pm
California law, as reflected in the 1978 California Supreme Court ruling in Schmitz v. [read post]
1 Oct 2014, 5:40 pm
It got a major boost from the Supreme Court in 1977, when the Justices ruled that a television news organization had covered too much of the daredevil act of a “human cannonball. [read post]
18 Apr 2018, 9:01 pm
(As an aside, I note that it would be nice if there were a way to get the California Supreme Court to weigh in on this revision/amendment question before things get very far along—that is, before voters actually cast ballots on the measure). [read post]
3 Nov 2020, 9:01 pm
Last month, the Supreme Court heard argument in Torres v. [read post]
21 Jun 2021, 4:26 pm
What does the Supreme Court’s decision mean for these other cases— labor related and image rights? [read post]
20 Nov 2017, 6:54 am
California Supreme Court: Nope. [read post]
25 May 2012, 6:04 am
* In a Supreme Court decision split across gender lines, prosecutors can now get a do-over on criminal charges without double jeopardy, even if an otherwise deadlocked jury unanimously rejected them. [read post]
18 Feb 2009, 3:02 am
Supreme Court since 1975. [read post]
