Search for: "Jacobs, in Re"
Results 841 - 860
of 1,813
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Aug 2015, 12:03 pm
The story quotes one young member as writing to an older member, “What you’re describing isn’t called ‘peacefulness,’ it’s called, ‘shame and humiliation. [read post]
27 Jul 2015, 9:06 pm
“We’re doing an internal review on the situation,” said Staff Sgt. [read post]
27 Jul 2015, 6:07 am
Initial Public Offering Derivative Litigation, July 24, 2015, Jacobs, D.).Dismissals. [read post]
15 Jul 2015, 4:30 am
Facts: Mother and Father are the never-married parents of Child. [read post]
14 Jul 2015, 9:05 pm
value of review-copy books they’re sent [Ira Stoll, Future of Capitalism] “Every state county or municipality…should think long and hard before taking a dime in HUD money. [read post]
4 Jul 2015, 3:39 pm
Jacobs, C. [read post]
3 Jul 2015, 1:08 pm
Restaurants — particularly those that seek to maintain high-end wine cellars — can face their own set of problems (unless they’re willing to skirt the law, as many do). [read post]
30 Jun 2015, 4:13 am
Session 3: The Consumer in Different Trade Mark ContextsDo the questions that we have looked at in the first two sessions vary in different trademark and adjacent contexts? [read post]
30 Jun 2015, 2:47 am
However, the European Court of Justice extends the effects of res judicata to prejudicial questions of the validity of a choice-of-forum clause, in this respect it approves a European conception of substantive res judicata (ECJ, 15.11.2012 – Case C 456/11 – Gothaer Allgemeine Versicherung AG ./. [read post]
29 Jun 2015, 5:30 pm
As could be expected, we’re seeing a lot of analysis on the what last week’s big Supreme Court rulings mean for everyone going forward. [read post]
29 Jun 2015, 9:28 am
Robert Jacob: Doubts about so-called experts. [read post]
29 Jun 2015, 4:34 am
ECJ tends to say that when you’re assessing whether something is devoid of distinctive character/unregistrable, you use the POV of the consumer, and descriptive things ar [read post]
26 Jun 2015, 2:39 am
Other coverage comes from Richard Wolf at USA Today (who has another story focusing on the Chief Justice), from Jeremy Jacobs at Greenwire, where he discusses what the Court’s decision might mean for its ruling in the still-pending Clean Air Act cases, and from the Associated Press, which covers consumers’ reactions to the decisions. [read post]
23 Jun 2015, 10:52 pm
People like lawyers who care, they’re pleasantly surprised. [read post]
23 Jun 2015, 7:31 am
Richard Re covered the decision for this blog, with commentary from Noah Feldman at Bloomberg View and Steven Schwinn at the Constitutional Law Prof Blog. [read post]
22 Jun 2015, 12:38 pm
Jacobs(2009)32. [read post]
22 Jun 2015, 5:39 am
You’re not distracted by preconceptions about the person you’re dealing with or the situation you are in. [read post]
19 Jun 2015, 5:12 am
Cain comes from Hadir Aviram, who at PrawfsBlawg analyzes the case and posits whether it is “really worthwhile to continue tinkering with the machinery of death this way, rather than send convicted murderers . . . to long prison sentences”; and also at PrawfsBlawg from Richard Re, who looks at the connection between yesterday’s decision and Justice Ginsburg’s concurring opinion regarding the denial of certiorari in another case earlier this week. [read post]
17 Jun 2015, 9:32 am
Just as gripping is Jacobs’s willingness to reveal his trial missteps. [read post]
15 Jun 2015, 11:54 pm
Sir Jacob doesn’t understand the facts or the law! [read post]
