Search for: "John Does, 1-23" Results 841 - 860 of 2,160
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Nov 2018, 6:32 am by Shanelle Van
Third, Fihn contends that, while the TPNW does not raise the safeguards requirements, “this treaty does not lower the standard of safeguards from the NPT. [read post]
4 Oct 2023, 7:41 am by Norman L. Eisen
Trump Case No. 9:23-cr-80101 Charging instruments and Arraignment Superseding Indictment charging a third defendant, Carlos De Oliveira, with four counts, and adding three counts against Trump and two counts against Nauta (July 27, 2023) Indictment of Donald Trump and Waltine Nauta (June 8, 2023) Trump waiver of appearance at arraignment, and entry of not guilty plea (Aug. 4, 2023) Government notice of superseding indictment (July 27, 2023) Minute order for Nauta initial appearance and… [read post]
15 Feb 2011, 9:27 am by Stefanie Levine
id=900005498113&slreturn=1&hbxlogin=1. [6] Mark Guetlich, Patent Prosecution Highway-Strategic Considerations and Usefulness, Intellectual Property Owners Committee CLE Conference –Chicago Hilton, (Sept. 16, 2009), available at http://www.ipo.org/AM/Template.cfm? [read post]
29 Apr 2013, 9:36 am by INFORRM
There were also several resolved complaints, including: Mr Charles Tubbs v Daily Mail, No clause specified, 29/04/2013; Dr John Little v The Daily Telegraph, Clause 1, 26/04/2013; Mrs Deborah Farrell v That’s Life, Clause 1, 25/04/2012; Jessica Westwood v The Mail on Sunday, Clause 1, 25/04/2013; Neil Turner v The Daily Telegraph, Clause 1, 25/04/2013; Ms Judy Gibbons v Daily Mail, Clause 1, 25/04/2013; A woman v Daily Mail, Clause… [read post]
27 Mar 2019, 10:16 am by Margaret Taylor
Most notably, multiple news organizations have reported that in 2018 Trump pressured then-Chief of Staff John Kelly and then-White House counsel Don McGahn to approve the clearances over their objections and the objections of career security professionals. [read post]
30 Jan 2007, 6:16 pm
They claimed that they misunderstood the requirements of Section 1(a), did not understand the legal meaning of "use in commerce," and "honestly believed that their ownership of the same mark in Australia and their use in commerce of such mark in Australia justified their Section 1(a) filing in the U.S. [read post]
17 Jan 2011, 11:48 am by John L. Welch
Section 2(a) - disparagement: Precedential No. 10: Divided TTAB Panel Affirms 2(a) Disparagement Refusal of "KHORAN" for Wines Section 2(c) - lack of consent from living individual: Presidential No. 44: In Rare Section 2(c) Ruling, TTAB Affirms Refusal of "OBAMA BAHAMA PAJAMAS" Section 2(d) - likelihood of confusion: Precedential No. 50: TTAB Says Consent and License from Registrant Require Reversal of 2(d) Refusal of WACKER NEUSON over NEUSON for MachineryPrecedential No. 40:… [read post]
8 Nov 2008, 1:56 pm
Here we can point to Stanford's incredible record upset of USC [in 2007] 24-23, even though Stanford was the underdog by more than 40 points. [read post]
18 Apr 2024, 9:01 pm by renholding
And it is incumbent on each of us to make sure it does not come to pass and that investors are not harmed by noncompliance with the securities laws when it comes to this new technology. [read post]
27 Jun 2010, 9:13 am by INFORRM
Judgment in Khader v Aziz, was given on 23 June 2010. [read post]
17 Mar 2007, 11:01 am
Volta,, Opposition No. 91158304 (January 23, 2007), has pushed the issue of fraud into the spotlight once again. [read post]
5 Jun 2023, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Ex. 1).1 Respondent denied the charge.At a two-day trial, held via video-conference and concluded on February 23, 2023,petitioner relied on documentary evidence and testimony from two of its employees, Firearms Instructor Villafane and Investigator Hall. [read post]