Search for: "Kelly v. State"
Results 841 - 860
of 2,337
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Oct 2021, 7:00 am
Citing Matter of Baloy v Kelly, 92 AD3d 521, the Appellate Division opined that the possibility of Officer obtaining administrative relief was exhausted when Officer retired without a change in his modified status. [read post]
31 Oct 2013, 10:48 am
MCINTOSH v. [read post]
12 Nov 2013, 9:21 am
Affirmed.Case Name: EVELYN DIFELICI, f/k/a EVELYN BARNES v. [read post]
11 Dec 2014, 1:00 am
This case, Linde et al. v. [read post]
1 Jul 2013, 7:06 am
Citing Matter of Kelly v Safir, 96 NY2d 32, the Appellate Division, noting that the volunteer’s acts of misconduct might not, individually, warrant expulsion from the Fire Department, said that “considering his conduct as a whole, we do not find the penalty of expulsion to be so disproportionate to the disciplinary charges as to be shocking to our sense of fairness. [read post]
23 Apr 2024, 6:00 am
As to the penalty imposed, dismissal from his employment with the New York City police department, the Appellate Division opined that "the penalty of dismissal is not disproportionate to the seriousness of the multiple violations involved", citing Matter of Kelly v Safir, 96 NY2d 32. [read post]
23 Apr 2024, 6:00 am
As to the penalty imposed, dismissal from his employment with the New York City police department, the Appellate Division opined that "the penalty of dismissal is not disproportionate to the seriousness of the multiple violations involved", citing Matter of Kelly v Safir, 96 NY2d 32. [read post]
7 Oct 2021, 7:00 am
Citing Matter of Baloy v Kelly, 92 AD3d 521, the Appellate Division opined that the possibility of Officer obtaining administrative relief was exhausted when Officer retired without a change in his modified status. [read post]
7 Oct 2021, 7:00 am
Citing Matter of Baloy v Kelly, 92 AD3d 521, the Appellate Division opined that the possibility of Officer obtaining administrative relief was exhausted when Officer retired without a change in his modified status. [read post]
8 Dec 2014, 10:58 am
J & J Sports states that it is the exclusive domestic commercial distributor of the Program. [read post]
4 Jul 2022, 5:30 am
Supreme Court survive overturning Roe v. [read post]
14 Jul 2012, 3:00 am
Bookstores v Auxiliary Serv. [read post]
13 Apr 2012, 6:18 am
State, supra (quoting Brown v. [read post]
23 Sep 2009, 7:04 am
Kelly was not with him.] [read post]
17 Nov 2010, 11:39 am
Kelly, 23 F.3d 507, 511 (D.C. [read post]
1 Aug 2012, 10:56 am
In Johnson v. [read post]
28 Jul 2010, 12:10 pm
Justice Weaver, joined by Justice Hathaway, issued a separate dissenting opinion agreeing with Justice Young’s criticism that the new rule will have unforseen consequences, and stating that “the majority’s unrestrained decision today is a huge mistake. [read post]
23 Nov 2010, 9:06 am
If you need assistance in putting together a citation from this, or any future opinion using the Universal Citation form, please contact the Wyoming State Law Library and we will provide any needed assistance]Summaries are prepared by Law Librarians and are not official statements of the Wyoming Supreme CourtCase Name: Kelly v. [read post]
19 Feb 2017, 9:15 am
Since Yamataya v. [read post]
28 Mar 2008, 11:52 am
State of Indiana (NFP) Dwayne Kelly v. [read post]
