Search for: "Label v Label" Results 841 - 860 of 13,299
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Aug 2023, 1:06 pm by Chris Castle
Those companies and services properly obtained the rights they need to operate from UMG, or from the associated record labels and publishers. [read post]
8 Jan 2010, 9:55 pm by V.Venkatesan
I am currently reading the Bombay High Court's 150-pages judgment in R.V.Bhasin v. [read post]
29 May 2017, 10:33 am by Walter Olson
In the settlement of the class action Kumar v. [read post]
21 Apr 2010, 10:19 pm by Ben Vernia
Describing several examples of off-label use of drugs which had devastating adverse consequences for patients (e.g., diethylstilbestrol, or DES), the US’s brief asserts that, contrary to the company’s claims, its constitutional challenge would open the door to pharmaceutical advertising for off-label uses, including dangerous ones such as the government described. [read post]
23 Feb 2010, 7:43 am by Beck, et al.
  Today, we lost the first post-Levine appellate decision in this area, Mason v. [read post]
1 Apr 2016, 3:31 am by Lindsey A. Zahn
Wine was also the topic of the 2005 Supreme Court case Granholm v. [read post]
26 Jun 2008, 10:02 pm
Singers, musicians and the labels get no royalties when AM-FM radio broadcasters air their performances. [read post]