Search for: "Little v. State" Results 841 - 860 of 24,165
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Jan 2012, 2:34 pm
  Asking the California Supreme Court to decide yet another state law issue on which, true enough, there's little to no California precedent. [read post]
23 Jun 2011, 3:32 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
"This outcome makes little sense," she wrote. [read post]
26 Apr 2024, 6:36 am by The Petrie-Flom Center Staff
Supreme Court’s withdrawal of the longstanding constitutional right to abortion in Dobbs v. [read post]
Notwithstanding this elucidation by the Court, the passage still does little to clarify what would constitute an “overwhelming supervening act”. [read post]
13 Jun 2015, 1:30 pm by Cody Poplin
  Her question was whether it would be constitutional for Congress to enact a law requiring the Secretary of State to send an official letter to all foreign ministers whenever a U.S. citizen was born in Jerusalem, announcing that a new American had been born 'in Israel.'  The idea that such a law would be constitutional, said Justice Kagan, 'seems, well, a little bit shocking.'" [read post]
20 Jun 2011, 4:00 am by Nathaniel Grow
It has been a little over a year since the United States Supreme Court issued its decision in American Needle, Inc. v. [read post]
22 Feb 2012, 9:10 am by appealattorneylaw
Now that the Mardi Gras season is over, the federal criminal defense and immigration defense lawyers in Palm Beach, Broward, and Miami Dade county may want to take a few moments moment to read a newly issued opinion from the United States Supreme Court: Kawashima v. [read post]
12 Jun 2014, 9:04 am by INFORRM
The Court of Appeal has published its decision in Guardian News Media v AB and CD. [read post]
24 Oct 2016, 8:25 am by Liisa Speaker
Very little oral argument was dedicated to the admissibility of the hospital record. [read post]
1 May 2012, 8:00 am by Matt Brown
Many judges are little more than prosecutors in robes. [read post]
19 Mar 2018, 4:42 am by admin
The amendment has been construed to bar suits by citizens against their own states, Papasan v. [read post]