Search for: "Lopez v. United States" Results 841 - 860 of 913
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Aug 2008, 2:15 pm
Mitchell, No. 02-3505 Denial of a petition for habeas relief in a death penalty case is reversed where: 1) a state court applied the Strickland standard in an objectively unreasonable manner for purposes of claims that petitioner's counsel were ineffective in preparing for the sentencing phase of his trial; 2) the state court unreasonably determined that the alleged errors of trial counsel did not prejudice petitioner's case; and 3) a state court erroneously… [read post]
27 May 2008, 10:06 am
y it matters in light of a concurrently running longer sentence U.S. 1st Circuit Court of Appeals, May 21, 2008 Lopez-Quinones v. [read post]
13 Dec 2010, 7:01 pm
 But first I should say that en route to that conclusion, Judge Hudson did get something important right: He rejected the federal government's argument that because the Act was challenged on its face, it had to be upheld unless, pursuant to United States v. [read post]
5 Jan 2008, 7:56 am
Randy E, Barnett (Georgetown) is first and begins by discussing Gonzales v. [read post]
3 Nov 2020, 4:48 pm by INFORRM
Indeed, I have written about the surveillance of employees in the workplace, and their right to privacy pursuant to Article 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights, in a previous Inforrm post in the context of the European Court of Human Rights’ judgments in Bărbulescu v Romania [2016] App. no. 61496/08 and Lopez Ribalda v Spain [2019] ECHR. [read post]
10 Sep 2012, 4:33 am
  Forfeiture by wrongdoing in a principle in the common law that was first recognized by the United States Supreme Court in Reynolds v. [read post]
30 Mar 2012, 12:45 pm by Ilya Somin
He wrote well-known dissents in several previous cases striking down congressional laws on federalism grounds, including United States v. [read post]
19 Apr 2013, 8:22 pm by Ken White
Lopez, 450 F.3d 445, 448 (9th Cir. 2006), Lee v. [read post]
2 Apr 2012, 7:07 am by Marty Lederman
Over at the Volokh Conspiracy, my colleague Randy Barnett, who's representing the private plaintiffs in the ACA case, has written a post focusing upon Justice Kennedy's expressed concern that in order for the Court to uphold section 5000A of the ACA, it might have to issue what Randy calls an "unbounded" opinion, one that would permit Congress to require the purchase of virtually any product--an outcome that Justice Kennedy fears would “change the relationship of the… [read post]
28 Aug 2020, 3:30 am by Eric B. Meyer
Start by believing what you saw in the Jacob Blake video and accepting that racism is very much alive (but not well) in the United States. [read post]