Search for: "MYERS v. STATE"
Results 841 - 860
of 1,542
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Nov 2014, 1:18 pm
United States. [read post]
Evidence from micro-level patent application data or gobbledygook from the depths of legal academia?
18 Nov 2014, 9:44 pm
” from a post by Kelly Laycock.The logic and style of the arguments about patent examiners is indeed incomprehensible.Perhaps "patenthawk" should include law review articles, in addition to court decisions, within his scope; from a recent post on Bristol-Myers Squibb v. [read post]
18 Nov 2014, 9:51 am
United States v. [read post]
18 Nov 2014, 9:33 am
”In Gao v. [read post]
15 Nov 2014, 4:51 am
City of Baton Rouge/Parish of East Baton Rouge v Myers, 145 So. 3d 320 (LA 7/1/2014) The opinion can be accessed at: http://www.lasc.org/opinions/2014/13CA2011cw13CD2036.opn.pdfFiled under: Current Caselaw, Family, Standing [read post]
15 Nov 2014, 4:51 am
City of Baton Rouge/Parish of East Baton Rouge v Myers, 145 So. 3d 320 (LA 7/1/2014) The opinion can be accessed at: http://www.lasc.org/opinions/2014/13CA2011cw13CD2036.opn.pdfFiled under: Current Caselaw, Family, Standing [read post]
14 Nov 2014, 6:39 am
Josh Blackman asks about the source of this general proposition: I think the Solicitor General is referring to Myers v. [read post]
13 Nov 2014, 9:23 pm
Maryland, 17 U.S. (4 Wheat.) 316, 401–25 (1819) (same); Legal Tender Cases, 79 U.S. 457, 536–38 (1870) (paper money); Myers v. [read post]
7 Nov 2014, 3:03 pm
See Stewart v. [read post]
7 Nov 2014, 5:52 am
By our count, federal judges have trampled over state sovereignty with respect to the heeding presumption in no fewer than eleven states – Alaska, Colorado (despite contrary state-court authority), Georgia, Hawaii, Illinois, Iowa, Kentucky, Maine, New York (despite contrary state-court authority), South Dakota, and Wyoming.Finally, because various states have taken quite different approaches to whether a heeding presumption exists at all and… [read post]
28 Oct 2014, 3:14 pm
United States v. [read post]
20 Oct 2014, 9:56 am
Board of Regents v. [read post]
15 Oct 2014, 11:52 am
In Aycock v. [read post]
15 Oct 2014, 7:56 am
For that reason, Justice Myers stated, "I am reluctant to declare any rights in the laneway that may affect the owners' interests. [read post]
13 Oct 2014, 9:30 am
In a recent Georgia Supreme Court case, Board of Regents of the University System of Georgia v. [read post]
13 Oct 2014, 5:27 am
In Bonner v. [read post]
8 Oct 2014, 5:26 am
In Cadle v. [read post]
1 Oct 2014, 9:05 am
In Jackson v. [read post]
25 Sep 2014, 6:57 am
” State v. [read post]
15 Sep 2014, 6:32 am
Doing so requires more than base-level knowledge of state and federal labor law. [read post]
