Search for: "Martin v. United States"
Results 841 - 860
of 2,277
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Oct 2016, 7:33 am
Although the armed forces could employ this prohibition to restrain retirees’ political speech, the government has only initiated court-martial proceedings against one retired service member—nearly one hundred years ago in United States v. [read post]
23 Sep 2016, 7:49 am
Shifting our review to the United States, Justice Sonia Sotomayor read the Declaration of Independence for Heritage Day at the Oysterponds Historical Society in Orient, New York. [read post]
19 Sep 2016, 11:55 am
The Article III question is now the subject of a potentially landmark case, al Bahlul v. [read post]
12 Sep 2016, 8:46 am
Anderson by consulting the Baltimore City Homicide Unit and Mr. [read post]
9 Sep 2016, 11:33 am
(AIG), has filed a petition for a writ of certiorari asking that the United States Supreme Court declare that a portion of New York’s Martin Act is preempted by federal law. [read post]
8 Sep 2016, 9:01 pm
That case—G.G. v. [read post]
31 Aug 2016, 6:30 am
The government might seek to introduce testimony from officials with knowledge of the United States’ dealings with Al Qaeda before 9/11. [read post]
24 Aug 2016, 3:01 am
Anne Marie Brennan, Historical Reflections on the Criminalisation of Terrorism under International Law from the League of Nations to R v. [read post]
22 Aug 2016, 9:31 am
The case is Lockheed Martin Corporation v. [read post]
14 Aug 2016, 1:00 pm
You just suggested what the plain text of the consent decree states unequivocally is prohibited conduct! [read post]
1 Aug 2016, 1:54 pm
Under Crawford v. [read post]
31 Jul 2016, 12:00 am
In the London Review of Books, but behind a paywall, are a review of Entick v. [read post]
26 Jul 2016, 1:13 pm
WHETHER THE AFCCA ERRED WHEN IT FAILED TO GRANT RELIEF WHERE THE MILITARY JUDGE INSTRUCTED THE MEMBERS, “IF BASED ON YOUR CONSIDERATION OF THE EVIDENCE, YOU ARE FIRMLY CONVINCED THAT THE ACCUSED IS GUILTY OF ANY OFFENSE CHARGED, YOU MUST FIND HIM GUILTY,” WHERE SUCH AN INSTRUCTION IS IN VIOLATION OF UNITED STATES v. [read post]
21 Jul 2016, 1:43 pm
Markle Interests, L.L.C. v. [read post]
21 Jul 2016, 1:43 pm
Markle Interests, L.L.C. v. [read post]
21 Jul 2016, 1:43 pm
Markle Interests, L.L.C. v. [read post]
19 Jul 2016, 11:18 am
But in United States v. [read post]
12 Jul 2016, 9:30 pm
United States, which involved a claim that a federal court had misapplied the guidelines when sentencing the petitioner, Saul Molina-Martine. [read post]
11 Jul 2016, 7:27 am
United States v. [read post]
11 Jul 2016, 7:08 am
On U.S. v. [read post]
