Search for: "Miller v. State of New York"
Results 841 - 860
of 1,053
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Aug 2019, 6:30 am
This event is closed to the public.Student Presenters:Jonathon Booth, Harvard University (jonathonbooth@g.harvard.edu) The Birth of Policing in Post-Emancipation JamaicaLauren Feldman, Johns Hopkins University (lauren.feldman@jhu.edu) Constructing Legal Matrimony and the State in New York and the United States: Debating New York's Marriage Act of 1827 and its EffectsJamie Grischkan, Boston University… [read post]
25 Oct 2019, 10:00 am
Nor could he point to any formal guidance instructing state prosecutors, municipal police departments, or the courts on how to apply New Hampshire's criminal defamation statute to potentially violative speech. [read post]
22 Jul 2021, 6:09 am
State v. [read post]
24 Oct 2021, 4:17 pm
The New York Times has more information here. [read post]
21 Apr 2012, 5:06 pm
” A New York Times piece praised the Judge’s insistence on the primacy of fundamental rights in the face of technological change, and suggested that it was “too bad her separate opinion mustered no other votes”. [read post]
28 Jan 2018, 9:01 pm
Socialist Workers Party v. [read post]
3 Mar 2008, 12:13 pm
Liddell, No. 07-1337 In a prosecution for being a felon in possession of a firearm, denial of a motion to suppress a post-arrest statement made without the warnings required by Miranda is affirmed where the arresting officers' in-custody questioning fell within the public safety exception to Miranda established in New York v. [read post]
2 Sep 2009, 11:22 pm
Feb. 27, 2007) (New Jersey statute); Weiss v. [read post]
16 Aug 2010, 4:36 am
Fang G, Araujo V, Guerrant RL [read post]
14 Jun 2007, 10:38 am
New York has nothing like ABSFA on its books. [read post]
28 Sep 2015, 6:00 am
Wiretap Act (also known as Title III) prohibits the interception of a live communication (e.g., a telephone call) only if the interception occurs in the United States; it does not prohibit or regulate wiretaps (interception) conducted abroad.[8] Similarly, the U.S. [read post]
13 May 2021, 8:11 am
” “No Privity, No Recovery, When Law Firm Seeks Payment From Client’s Insurer” — “A law firm may not recover its legal fees from its client’s insurer according to a decision of the New York Appellate Division for the First Judicial Department”: “Plaintiff law firm lacks standing to recover its legal fees under the insurance policy, to which it is not a named party (Miller & Wrubel, P.C. v Todtman, Nachamie,… [read post]
16 Jul 2011, 8:39 am
”[3] Contrast that case with the highly politicized New York case Keren Elmaliach v. [read post]
16 Jul 2011, 8:39 am
”[3] Contrast that case with the highly politicized New York case Keren Elmaliach v. [read post]
5 Jul 2012, 4:01 am
No. 1 LLC v. [read post]
14 Oct 2008, 11:05 am
Broich, President, Fortress Security From time to time a reader will submit a question concerning a personnel matter that may be of general interest to the readers of New York Public Personnel Law. [read post]
4 Jan 2023, 5:57 am
Reuben Clark Law School The Reports of My Death Are Greatly Exaggerated: The Continued Vitality of Worcester v. [read post]
14 Dec 2014, 3:55 pm
Multiple New York judges expressed their concerns about servicing arrangements while approving structured settlement transfers. [read post]
8 Jun 2012, 1:33 pm
" New York Attorney General Eric T. [read post]
8 Jun 2012, 1:22 pm
" New York Attorney General Eric T. [read post]
